This Author published in this journals
All Journal Menara Ilmu
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

ANALISIS HUKUM ATAS PERJANJIAN KERJA SAMA TENTANG PEMBANGUNAN PEREMAJAAN PASAR PUSAT SUKA RAMAI ANTARA PEMERINTAH KOTA PEKANBARU SEBAGAI PEMEGANG HAK PENGELOLAAN DENGAN PT MAKMUR PAPAN PERMATA Hamler -
Menara Ilmu Vol 11, No 74 (2017): Vol. XI Jilid 1 No. 74, Januari 2017
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/mi.v11i74.76

Abstract

Pekanbaru as the capital of Riau province, in fact has a dominant position in the management of the market, not least Suka Ramai Central Market. Due to the policy that states that existing buildings in the Market Suka Ramai unfit for habitation as well as their desire to rejuvenate the building so as to add economic value, then Pekanbaru City Government has worked with investors in the construction of the rejuvenation. Cooperation was eventually contained in Syafri Muchtar notarial deed No. 42 dated 5 October 2000. There are problems in the implementation of the agreement, especially about the lack of legal protection for the trader who owns the rights to the land prior to the agreement agreed. From the research results can be explained that the cooperation agreement between the City of Pekanbaru with PT Makmur Papan Permata on Market Revitalization Development Centre Suka Ramai begins with the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Government of Pekanbaru as the Holder of management rights by PT Makmur Papan Permata. As a result of the MoU do not have legal consequences for the parties, then the next MoU followed up by the Cooperation Agreement Form is Notaril. Indeed there Pekanbaru City Government policy to engage third parties in the development, but also Pekanbaru City Government has taken steps so that a political cooperation agreement that has been agreed can be implemented.In fact, there are no legal protections as provided in cooperation and other provisions. This can be seen with the implementation of the agreement then they are 27 traders who feel unfairly treated in the process of emptying acreage. In fact, due to legal challenge made by these traders Court consequences of them do not have the right anymore to get a new building. Keywords: Memorandum of Understanding, agreement, unfairly treated.