Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Explore IT : Jurnal Keilmuan dan Aplikasi Teknik Informatika JURTEKSI
Setyawan Wibisono
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Universitas Stikubank
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
G20 Country Rating System in Handling Covid-19 Using the Hybrid AHP-TOPSIS Method Fandhika Bayu Fitri; Setyawan Wibisono

Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35891/explorit.v13i1.2491

Abstract

Covid-19 is a new type of infectious virus that attacks the respiratory tract. The process of spreading the virus is fast, making some countries implement several policies such as regional quarantine and social distancing. However, due to limited human activities in various countries it has an impact on the global economic downturn. The magnitude of the impact of Covid-19 on humans and the world economy, made the G20 member countries agree to cooperate to accelerate global economic recovery. Organization. The G20 is an international forum whose members are from the world's developed economies that focus on discussing important issues of the world economy. Even though it contains developed economies, cases of Covid-19 are still high in several member countries of the G20 organization. Based on the condition of the high number of Covid-19 cases in the G20 member countries, this study aims to build a ranking system for the G20 countries in handling Covid-19 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for the weighting process of criteria and the Technique for Order Preference by method. Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for alternative ranking process. In the implementation of the AHP method, the weight of each criterion is obtained as follows: the number of testing ratio is 0.545274265, the ratio of the number of cured is 0.24396228, the ratio of positive numbers is 0.156108929 and the ratio of the number of deaths is 0.054654525. The results of the weighted criteria that have been calculated, the TOPSIS method is used for the alternative ranking process. The results of the highest preference value are obtained by the 6th alternative with a preference value of 0.825108653.
A RANKING SYSTEM FOR HANDLING COVID-19 IN SOUTHEAST ASIAN USING AHP-COPRAS Setyawan Wibisono; Wiwien Hadikurniawati; Arief Jananto; Taufiq Dwi Cahyono
JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi) Vol 9, No 1 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : STMIK Royal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33330/jurteksi.v9i1.1646

Abstract

Abstract: One of the institutions that stated the poor handling of Covid-19 in Indonesia was the Lowy Institute. On March 13, 2021, Lowy Institute put Indonesia in 89th rank out of 102 countries that were successfully surveyed regarding the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic. This research is an attempt to critique the Lowy Institute's assessment. The COPRAS-AHP hybrid method was used. The AHP method, especially in the pairwise comparison section, is used as a method to determine the validity of the criterion weights. Five criteria were used in determining the ranking of the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic in countries in the Southeast Asian region. Each criterion is given a weight that is determined subjectively but by considering the level of importance of each criterion. The weighting of the criteria by using pairwise comparison resulted in: test per population, positive per test, vaccine per population, recovered per positive, deaths per positive. This study produces conclusions that are not much different from the Lowy Institute release. Indonesia is one of the countries where the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic is at a low level, Indonesia is ranked 10th out of 11 countries in the Southeast Asia region, with a utility value 16.29%.            Keywords: AHP; COPRAS; covid-19;pairwise comparison; ranking Abstrak: Salah satu lembaga yang menyatakan buruknya penanganan Covid-19 di Indonesia adalah Lowy Institute. Pada 13 Maret 2021 menempatkan Indonesia di peringkat 89 dari 102 negara yang berhasil disurvei berkenaan dengan penanganan pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini merupakan upaya kritisi terhadap penilaian Lowy Institute. Digunakan metode hibrid COPRAS-AHP. Metode AHP, khususnya pada bagian pairwise comparison digunakan sebagai metode untuk menentukan validitas bobot kriteria. Digunakan lima kriteria dalam menentukan pemeringkatan penanganan pandemi Covid-19 pada negara-negara di kawasan Asia Tenggara. Masing-masing kriteria diberikan bobot yang ditentukan secara subjektif namun dengan mempertimbangkan tingkat kepentingan masing-masing kriteria. Pembobotan kriteria dengan menggunakan pairwise comparison menghasilkan: kriteria tes per populasi, positif per tes, vaksin per populasim, sembuh per positif, meninggal per positif. Penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan yang tidak jauh berbeda dengan rilis Lowy Institute. Indonesia adalah salah satu negara dengan penanganan pandemi Covid-19 berada dalam level yang relatif rendah, peringkat 10 dari 11 negara di kawasan Asia Tenggara, dengan nilai utilitas 16,29 %. Kata kunci: AHP; COPRAS; covid-19; pairwise comparison; pemeringkatan 
Co-Authors Arief Jananto Fandhika Bayu Fitri Taufiq Dwi Cahyono Wiwien Hadikurniawati