Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling Jurnal Daya Mas : Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hasil Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pilar Teknologi : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Teknik
Rosyid Kholilur Rohman
Universitas Merdeka Madiun
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pelatihan Penyusunan Rencana Anggaran Biaya Talud di Desa Tladan Kecamatan Kawedanan Kabupaten Magetan Rosyid Kholilur Rohman; Setiyo Daru Cahyono; Seno Aji
JURNAL DAYA-MAS Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): JURNAL DAYA-MAS
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33319/dymas.v6i2.70

Abstract

The government promotes rural infrastructure development through Village Fund Allocation (ADD). In the process of planning, development and reporting the village government is given the broadest authority. This authority requires the village government to have the ability to prepare a Budget Plan (RAB) and report on the use of funds. The ability of village communities in preparing Budget Plan for the Talud is still minimal and training is needed to improve their abilities. The results of this training are expected to be beneficial for the people of Tladan Village, Kawedanan District, Magetan regency so that the infrastructure development program in the village will run better and achieved good quality.
Analisis Stabilitas Sheet Pile Kali Sono Kota Madiun Seno Aji; Rosyid Kholilur Rohman; Setiyo Daru Cahyono
JURNAL PILAR TEKNOLOGI Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ilmu Teknik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JURNAL PILAR TEKNOLOGI
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Merdeka Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33319/piltek.v5i2.57

Abstract

Abstract— Slope slides can occur if the specific gravity of the land working as the driving force is greater than the shear stress that serves as a restraining force. To prevent landslides there are several methods that can be used, one of them is using sheet pile as a soil barrier. Besides working to hold the soil, the sheet pile also functions to prevent the entry of water into dug pits, so it is very good to be used at the edge of the sea or river. The formulation of the problem that arises is how the value of active and passive soil pressure on the sheet pile, as well as how the suitable CPC Sheet Pile specifications are used in this study. The research method used is geotechnical analysis for sheet pile retaining walls. Based on soil data and calculation analysis, the value of active soil pressure on sheet pile is 104.06 kN / m and the value of passive soil pressure is 206.19 kN / m2. The CPC Sheet Pile specification used is Type W-600A, 15 meters long with Mcrack = 50.6 Ton.meter. Keywords—: Slope slides; sheet piles; the value of active and passive; geotechnical analysis.
Perbandingan Nilai Kuat Tekan Beton Normal Menggunakan Hammer Test dan Compression Testing Machine Laily Fatmawati; Rochidajah Rochidajah; Rosyid Kholilur Rohman
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK) Vol. 4 No. 6 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling: Special Issue (General)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jpdk.v4i6.9846

Abstract

Terdapat beberapa bentuk metode pengujian kekuatan tekan yang dapat digunakan diantaranya pengujian – pengujian yang bersifat tidak merusak (non destructive test), dan yang merusak secara keseluruhan komponen – komponen yang diuji (destructive test).Pada penelitian ini dilakukan pengujian menggunakan hammer test dan compression testing machine,kemudian membanding kan hasil pemgujian dari masing-masing metode tersebut. Benda uji yang digunakan merupakan sampel dengan mutu K-200 dan K-250 berusia 28 hari, yang masing-masing mutu berjumlah 6 buah sampel.Berdasarkan hasil pengujian menggunakan hammer test baik pada benda uji mutu K-200 maupun K-200 memiliki perbandingan terhadap mutu rencana sebesar 17,09%. Sedangkan hasil pengujian menggunakan compression testing machine memiliki perbandingan tehadap mutu rencana sebesar 9,07%. Dan selisih antara pengujian hammer test dan compression testing machine sebesar 8,01%
Co-Authors Laily Fatmawati Rochidajah Rochidajah Seno Aji Setiyo Daru Cahyono