Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Djodi Suranto
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
FUNGSI MAJELIS KEHORMATAN NOTARIS DITINJAU DALAM PRESPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN JABATAN NOTARIS DAN KEPENTINGAN UMUM Endah Sumiarti; Djodi Suranto; Yennie K. Milono
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 2, No 1 (2016): Volume 2 Nomor 1 Januari - Juni 2016
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1038.012 KB) | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v2i1.936

Abstract

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji konstruksi penegakan hukum pidana terhadap Notaris berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris dan meninjau kembali fungsi Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam mewujudkan perlindungan notaris. posisi dan kepentingan publik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konstruksi penegakan hukum pidana terhadap notaris yang dipandu oleh KUHAP dapat dilaksanakan selama tidak bertentangan dengan UU No. 2 tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Posisi Notaris di mana Pidana Prosedur Kode adalah lex generalis dan UU No. 2 tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 30 tahun 2004 tentang Notaris Jabatan adalah spesialis lex. Untuk keperluan proses peradilan, penyidik, jaksa penuntut umum atau hakim dengan persetujuan Dewan Kehormatan Notaris berwenang untuk mengambil salinan akta dan / atau surat yang melekat pada akta notaris atau protokol dalam penyimpanan notaris dan untuk memanggil notaris untuk menghadiri pemeriksaan yang berkaitan dengan akta atau protokol Notaris yang ada di notaris penyimpanan. Persetujuan Ketua Dewan Kehormatan Notaris (MKN) kepada penyidik adalah dasar hukum untuk pembenaran notaris untuk mengungkapkan rahasia posisinya, tanpa dikenakan saksi. Kondisi demikian berlaku untuk proses penuntutan dan persidangan.Kata Kunci : Notaris, Majelis Kehormatan Notaris, Kepentingan Umum. AbstractThe purpose of this study is to examine the construction of criminal law enforcement against Notaries based on Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public and reviewing the function of the Notary Honorary Council in realizing notary protection. public position and interests. The results showed that the construction of criminal law enforcement against a notary who is guided by the Criminal Procedure Code can be implemented as long as it does not conflict with Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position where the Criminal Procedure Code is lex generalis and Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position is a lex specialist. For the purposes of the judicial process, the investigator, public prosecutor or judge with the approval of the Notary Honorary Board is authorized to take a copy of the deed and / or letter attached to the notarial deed or protocol in notary storage and to summon the notary to attend the examination relating to the notarial deed or protocol which is in the storage notary. The Chairman of the Notary Honorary Council's (MKN) approval of the investigator is the legal basis for the notary's justification to reveal the secret of his position, without being subject to witnesses. Such conditions apply to the prosecution and trial process.Keywords: Notary Public, Notary Honorary Council, Public Interest.
IMPLEMENTASI ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN BERSIFAT BESCHIKKING DALAM TATA USAHA TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA Djodi Suranto
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.1.2017.129-144

Abstract

Implementation of good governance general establishment and application in the formation of good governance implementation in Indonesian National Army (TNI) Administration in the Central Office and Base Office (Mabes TNI), and also its roles in equipping the weakness, ambiguities and lack of ordinance as a law finding. Results of this study find and reveal the implementation of several principles, having formal in character, they are: prudent preparation principle, motivation and prohibition in procedural abuse, and matrial character are: law certainty, trust and expectation, prohibition on authority abuse and equality principles. The principles are applied due to its formation is in accordance with prevailed, developed and grown custom law in governance implementation practice, and also because it is according to the higher law norms and also the existing relationship between factual conditions with the incurred consequences. Thereinafter, the principles have very important roles in fulfilling the weakness and ambiguities and also the lackness of ordinance as law finding for the formation of good governance implementation in Indonesian National Army Administration. Keyword: good governance general establishment and application, beschikking, Indonesian National Army
Co-Authors Endah Sumiarti Yennie K. Milono