Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Idris Nasution
El-Ahli : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): El-Ahli : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : P3M STAIN Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/el-ahli.v1i2.72

Abstract

ABSTRACTION IDRIS The responsibility of a crime is a case that must be responsible by the doer that has done the crime, although the doer is an adult or a child. One of the sample in a decision No. 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2015/PN.Tjb, the doer is a child, namely Dicky Donatus Situmorang, 17 years old. The defendant has a validity and assured proven in doing desecrate to injustice to someone consciously in doing the desecrate injustice although is known or should be anticipated that the victim is 15 years old. He can not be married, an the doer in consciousness doing a gimmic for doing it. The case in this study is how to arrange the punishment for child as a pretrator in a desecrate injustice, what is the reason factor to a child to do a desecrate injustice and what is the law policy crime for that case no. 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2015/PN.Tjb. Whatever the decision has fulfil the sense of the justice.The study is done by using yuridis normative and yuridis empire approach. The source of the study is divided into primary and secondary data. The primary data which is gotten from the field research, that is by giving an interview to one of the child judge. In Tanjung Balai. The secondary data is gotten from library research by checking and correcting data , after the data is processed and analysed by using qualitative analysing.Based on the result and solution in the responsibility for child as a Perpetrator in doing a desecrate injustice in the court decision no : 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2015/PN.Tjb, namely the doer has a validity and insure evident in conducted action against the criminal law , that is section 82 Undang-Undang No 35 Tahun 2014 in child protection. The doer can be gotten the responsibility for the crime that he has done because in case has a fault and fulfil the element in doing injustice.The judge cares about the doer is a child, the regulation which arrange the child regulation, so the judge punished the child 2 years in prison, an 2 months grounding. The decision of the judge is not fulfil the sense of judgement because the judge punished the child 2 years in prison, an 2 months grounding. The suggestion in the research should be given and educated to the family for getting extra action , dont be punished in prison and 2 months grounding. The suggestion, the judge should think norm of the justice for all not only for the victim but also to the doer, and society and decision maker, and law government officer. Key Word : The Responsibility of the Child Crime as A Perpetrator in Doing A Desecrate Injustice.
ISTINBATH AL-AHKAM PROFESI RIBAWI PERSPEKTIF HADIS Nur Saniah Nur Saniah; Idris Nasution
Al-Mu'tabar Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Al-Mu'tabar
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hadis - P3M STAIN Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1273.644 KB) | DOI: 10.56874/jurnal ilmu hadis.v3i1.1068

Abstract

Riba transactions in any form have been expressly, clearly and qat'i prohibited in the Qur'an and the hadith of the Prophet. At the time when it was forbidden, usury was ingrained and rooted in the ignorant society which was a means of extorting the rich against the poor. This research is a library research or library research that is looking for data related to research in the form of books, journals and documents with qualitative research that aims to analyze hadiths related to the ribawi profession. This research is a library research or library research. This research is a qualitative research with descriptive analysis and content analysis. The results of this study indicate that the Prophet has condemned usury eaters (creditors), usury givers (debtors), registrars (administrative officers) and witnesses (notaries) related to the opinion of scholars about the prohibition of usury. To curse in this context is to be kept away from Allah's mercy, namely the loss of the blessings of wealth obtained through usury transactions, blessings not in quantity, but in the quality of assets obtained. If it is correlated with working in a conventional bank, then the law is haram based on this argument, except in special conditions and missions to change the world of conventional banking into Islamic banking. Transaksi riba dalam bentuk apapun telah dilarang secara tegas, jelas dan qat’i dalam al-Qur’an dan hadis nabi. Pada saat diharamkan, riba telah berurat dan berakar pada masyarakat jahiliah yang merupakan sarana pemerasan orang kaya terhadap orang miskin. penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan atau library research yaitu mencari data-data yang berkaitan dengan penelitian berupa buku-buku, jurnal-jurnal dan dokumen-dokumen dengan kualitatif yaitu penelitian yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis hadis-hadis yang berkaitan dengan profesi ribawi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan atau library research Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan analisis deskriptif dan konten analisis. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Nabi telah mengutuk pemakan riba (kreditur), pemberi riba (debitur), pencatat (petugas administrasinya) dan saksi-saksinya (notarisnya) dihubungkan dengan pendapat ulama tentang haramnya riba. Melaknat dalam konteks ini adalah dijauhkan dari rahmat Allah yakni hilangnya keberkahan harta yang diperoleh melaui transaksi riba, keberkahan bukan pada kuantitasnya, melainkan kualitas harta yang didapatkan. Apabila dikorelasikan dengan bekerja di bank kovensional, maka hukumnya adalah haram berdasarkan dalil tersebut, kecuali dalam keadaan dharurah dan misi tertentu untuk mengobah dunia perbankan konvensional menjadi perbankan syariah.