Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.259
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Batulis Civil Law Review
Sri Turatmiyah
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya
Religion Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Ineffectiveness of Mediation in Divorce Disputes: A Case Study in the Palembang Religious Court Sri Turatmiyah; Joni Emirzon; Annalisa Y; Haniyatul Husna binti Md Mohtar
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 56, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1232

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines the ineffective of the mediation process in divorce disputes at the Palembang Religious Court during the period from 2020 to 2022. Data was collected through observations, documentation, and interviews with litigants and judges involved in divorce cases at the Palembang Religious Court. Relying on the legal effectiveness theory, the study found that over a span of three years (2020, 2021, and 2022), the Palembang Religious Court successfully mediated only 33 divorce disputes (0.45%) out of a total of 7,338 cases. This indicates that mediation of divorce disputes at the court has not been effectively implemented. The article also reveals several factors contributing to this ineffectiveness, including (1) the complex background and reasons for the parties involved in the disputes, (2) an imbalance between the number of mediator judges and the number of cases brought to the court, (3) a lack of good faith on the part of the parties to engage in the mediation process, (4) inadequate resources and facilities, and (5) a low legal culture and poor legal awareness among the litigants. These findings reinforce the results of previous research on the ineffectiveness of mediation in divorce lawsuits in various courts across Indonesia.Abstrak: Artikel ini mengkaji problem tidak efektifnya proses mediasi sengketa perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Palembang selama rentang waktu 2020 hingga 2022. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, dokumentasi dan wawancara dengan sejumlah narasumber, baik yang berperkara maupun yang menangani perkara perceraian di Pengadian Agama Palembang. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa dalam kurun waktu tiga tahun (2020, 2021 dan 2022), Pengadilan Agama Palembang hanya berhasil memediasi 33 sengketa perceraian (0.45%) dari total 7.338 sengekta perceraian. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa mediasi sengketa perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Palembang belum berjalan secara efektif. Artikel ini juga menemukan bahwa penyebab tidak efektifnya proses mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Palembang, yakni (1) kompleksnya latar belakang alasan para pihak yang bersengketa atau mengajukan perceraian, (2) tidak berimbangnya rasio jumlah hakim mediator dengan banyaknya jumlah perkara yang masuk ke pengadilan, (3) tidak adanya itikad baik dari para pihak untuk melakukan proses mediasi, (4) sarana dan fasilitas yang tidak memadai, dan (5) budaya hukum yang rendah dan minimnya pengetahuan dan kesadaran hukum di kalangan para pihak yang bersengketa. Temuan ini menguatkan hasil penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya tentang tidak efektifnya mediasi dalam sengketa perceraian di berbagai Pengadilan di Indoensia. Keywords: The effectiveness of mediation; divorce disputes; the Palembang Religious Court 
Model Of Agreement Executing Fiduciary Collateral Objects With Underhand Selling Sri Turatmiyah; Annalisa Yahanan; Sri Handayani
Simbur Cahaya Volume 30 Nomor 1, Juni 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v30i1.2727

Abstract

Fiduciary Collateral gives priority to fiduciary recipient creditors. If the debtor defaults, then, complying with the provisions of Article 29 paragraph 1, sub-paragraph c, Law Number 42/1999 concerning Fiduciary Collateral, creditor may directly executes fiduciary objects with underhand  selling based on the agreement of the parties. This selling is implemented after the debtor is declared default in 1 (one) month after the written statement of the creditor to the debtor announced in at least 2 (two) newspapers in the relevant area. Execution of objects with underhand  selling based on  an agreement between the creditor and the debtor has not been clearly regulated in this law. Therefore, the model of agreement must be included at time on which the fiduciary agreement is made. Based on this background, it is necessary to conduct research with objective to obtain a agreement model of debtor and creditor in underhand selling of fiduciary collateral object if the debtor defaults. This study is normative research prioritizing secondary legal materials analyzed descriptively qualitatively. Creditor receiving Fiduciary Collateral is preferred and prioritized creditor because the creditor has rights to sell fiduciary objects with personal power. It is regulated in Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 42/1999 suggesting that that creditor has power to sell fiduciary collateral object on his/her own personal power.
The Ineffectiveness of Mediation in Divorce Disputes: A Case Study in the Palembang Religious Court Sri Turatmiyah; Joni Emirzon; Annalisa Y; Haniyatul Husna binti Md Mohtar
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 56 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1232

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines the ineffective of the mediation process in divorce disputes at the Palembang Religious Court during the period from 2020 to 2022. Data was collected through observations, documentation, and interviews with litigants and judges involved in divorce cases at the Palembang Religious Court. Relying on the legal effectiveness theory, the study found that over a span of three years (2020, 2021, and 2022), the Palembang Religious Court successfully mediated only 33 divorce disputes (0.45%) out of a total of 7,338 cases. This indicates that mediation of divorce disputes at the court has not been effectively implemented. The article also reveals several factors contributing to this ineffectiveness, including (1) the complex background and reasons for the parties involved in the disputes, (2) an imbalance between the number of mediator judges and the number of cases brought to the court, (3) a lack of good faith on the part of the parties to engage in the mediation process, (4) inadequate resources and facilities, and (5) a low legal culture and poor legal awareness among the litigants. These findings reinforce the results of previous research on the ineffectiveness of mediation in divorce lawsuits in various courts across Indonesia.Abstrak: Artikel ini mengkaji problem tidak efektifnya proses mediasi sengketa perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Palembang selama rentang waktu 2020 hingga 2022. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, dokumentasi dan wawancara dengan sejumlah narasumber, baik yang berperkara maupun yang menangani perkara perceraian di Pengadian Agama Palembang. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa dalam kurun waktu tiga tahun (2020, 2021 dan 2022), Pengadilan Agama Palembang hanya berhasil memediasi 33 sengketa perceraian (0.45%) dari total 7.338 sengekta perceraian. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa mediasi sengketa perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Palembang belum berjalan secara efektif. Artikel ini juga menemukan bahwa penyebab tidak efektifnya proses mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Palembang, yakni (1) kompleksnya latar belakang alasan para pihak yang bersengketa atau mengajukan perceraian, (2) tidak berimbangnya rasio jumlah hakim mediator dengan banyaknya jumlah perkara yang masuk ke pengadilan, (3) tidak adanya itikad baik dari para pihak untuk melakukan proses mediasi, (4) sarana dan fasilitas yang tidak memadai, dan (5) budaya hukum yang rendah dan minimnya pengetahuan dan kesadaran hukum di kalangan para pihak yang bersengketa. Temuan ini menguatkan hasil penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya tentang tidak efektifnya mediasi dalam sengketa perceraian di berbagai Pengadilan di Indoensia. Keywords: The effectiveness of mediation; divorce disputes; the Palembang Religious Court 
Co-Authors Ahmaturrahman Ahmaturrahman Annalisa Y Annalisa Y. Annalisa Yahanan Annalisa Yahanan Annalisa Yahanan Antonius Suhadi AR Febrian Arfianna Novera Bagoes Mahendra Jaya Febrian Febrian Firman Muntaqo Haniyatul Husna binti Md Mohtar Joni Emirzon K. N. Sofyan Hasan M. Syaifuddin Machdum Satria Muhammad Syaifuddin Sri Handayani syaifuddin syaifuddin