Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PARENTAL
Sutapa Mulja Widada
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Solo
Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PROBLEMATIKA PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH (PEMILUKADA) DI SURAKARTA TAHUN 2010 Widada, Sutapa Mulja
PARENTAL Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The results of research show that the regional election in Surakarta Year 2010 can run smoothly with parameters: administrative electoral success, political success and the electoral success of quality products. Nevertheless, there is still the problem of including the establishment Supervisory Committee, the organizing body Formation (PPK, PPS, and KPPS), budget Election, Data and Designation Update Voters List (DP4), Campaign, Regional Head General Election Regulations. Election classic problem of money politics going on with the modus operandi of money politics is varied, while the money politics. Election regulations contained in Article 82 paragraph ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of Act No. 32 of 2004 are legal loopholes of the legal aspects of the subject of money politics just a couple of candidates and/or the campaign team and aspects of legal sanctions no deterrent effect . Article 117 paragraph ( 2 ) of Act No. 32 of 2004 just threatened with imprisonment a minimum of 2 ( two ) months and a maximum of 12 (twelve ) months and / or a fine of Rp . 1,000,000.00 ( one million rupiah ) and maximum Rp . 10,000,000.00 ( ten million dollars ).
EFEKTIVITAS USIA 17 TAHUN PADA SIM C GUNA MENGURANGI KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS SURAKARTA Wibowo, Uce Ade; Widada, Sutapa Mulja
PARENTAL Vol 1, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The objecetive of research was to describe for find out about efectiveness of Article 81 Verse (2) Letter a of Act Number 22 of 2009 concern age requisite to get SIM C. Then, which factors can influence efectiveness of Article 81 Verse (2) Letter a of Act Number 22 of 2009. And, which effort can do for decrease traffic accident at teenager. This study belonged to an emperical law reserch that was descriptive in nature. Primary data was from observation and interview result. Secondary data was from library study on law, archive, and other document relevant to the research studied. Techniques of collecting data used were document, observation, and interview. Based on result of research that Article 81 condition 17th old, to age 20th old, then establish which independent institute for handle safety riding and traffic accident problem at teenager. Verse (2) Letter a of Act Number 22 of 2009, not effective for decrease traffic accident in Surakarta. Factor causing are legislation; upholder of the law; Facilitiy of uphold law; society; and culture. Effort for decrease traffic accident are increase from age
Co-Authors Uce Ade Wibowo