Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Iuris SIGn Jurnal Hukum
Slamet Sampurno Soewondo
Universitas Hasanuddin
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Pidana Penjara terhadap Kleptomaniak: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Syarif Saddam Rivanie; Slamet Sampurno Soewondo; Nur Azisa; Muhammad Topan Abadi; Ismail Iskandar
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 4 No 1: April - September 2022
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v4i1.169

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the Judge’s application of imprisonment to kleptomaniacs based on Decision No. 574/Pid.B/2019/PN.Dps. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The data was collected using literature study techniques on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected legal material is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods with a statute approach and a case approach which will then conclude the object of the research. The results show that the Judge’s application of imprisonment to the accused is based on Decision No. 574/Pid.B/2019/PN.Dps was the right decision. In this case, the problem of kleptomania currently ongoing in court should be proven with a Psychiatric Visum et Repertum. While the Letter of Statement No. 01/II.MR/RSPI/2019 cannot be the basis for the implementation of eliminating punishment. To determine that a person has kleptomania must undergo a process of examination for a minimum of two weeks to three months. Therefore, it is recommended that investigators provide the opportunity or take the initiative to prove the suspect’s mental condition before being processed to the following legal proof stage. So no more accused who prove their status as kleptomaniacs using the letter of statement. The Judge is also recommended to decide by giving measures sanction to the accused if proven to have kleptomania to avoid the recurrence of the crime of theft in the future.
Konsep Euthanasia di Berbagai Negara dan Pembaruannya di Indonesia Slamet Sampurno Soewondo; Syarif Saddam Rivanie Parawansa; Ulil Amri
Media Iuris Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v6i2.43841

Abstract

AbstractEuthanasia is a topic that always invites debate, especially the conflict between respect for the right to human life and moral values, ethics, and the sanctity of life as a gift from God Almighty. The Netherlands and Belgium, as open and free countries, have accommodated euthanasia in their medical practices. This article provides a description of how the Netherlands and Belgium carry out their euthanasia practices and how Indonesia responds to the euthanasia issue, both in terms of legislation and the way of life of the Indonesian people. Meanwhile in Indonesia, euthanasia is not explicitly recognized in Indonesian law, but there are several regulations that can ensnare euthanasia perpetrators, for example in Articles 344 and 345 of the Old Criminal Code and Articles 461 and 462 of the New Criminal Code. The process of legislation and legal renewal, especially regarding euthanasia, must still be carried out based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, taking into account the religious and cultural norms prevailing in Indonesian society.Keywords: Euthanasia; Update; Indonesia. AbstrakEuthanasia merupakan topik yang selalu mengundang perdebatan khususnya pertentangan antara penghormatan terhadap hak hidup manusia dengan nilai moral, etika, dan kesucian hidup sebagai anugerah Tuhan Yang Maha Kuasa. Belanda dan Belgia sebagai negara yang terbuka dan cenderung bebas telah mengakomodir euthanasia dalam praktik kedokteran mereka. Artikel ini memberikan uraian bagaimana Belanda dan Belgia menjalankan praktik euthanasia meraka dan seperti apa Indonesia dalam menyikapi isu euthanasia baik dalam perundang-undangan maupun pandangan hidup masyarakat Indonesia. jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif melalui pendekatan kasus, pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep serta pendekatan perbandingan.Sementara itu di Indonesia, secara tegas euthanasia belum dikenal dalam hukum Indonesia, namun terdapat beberapa peraturan yang dapat menjerat pelaku euthanasia misalnya dalam Pasal 344 dan Pasal 345 KUHP Lama serta Pasal 461 dan Pasal 462 KUHP Baru. Proses legislasi dan pembaruan hukum khususnya menyangkut euthanasia masih harus terus dilakukan dengan mendasarkan pada Pancasila dan UUD NRI 1945 dengan mempertimbangkan norma-norma agama maupun budaya yang berlaku di masyarakat Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Euthanasia; Pembaruan; Indonesia.
Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif bagi Penyalahguna Narkotika: Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Takalar Resky Ayu Lestari; Syarif Saddam Rivanie; Slamet Sampurno Soewondo
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 5 No 1: April - September 2023
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v5i1.275

Abstract

This research aims to examine and analyze how the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office applies the Guidelines of Attorney General Number 18 of 2021. This research uses an empirical legal research method. All collected data is then qualitatively analyzed to describe the problem and answer the research objectives. The results show that Sofyan Setiawan’s case is the sole example of implementing restorative justice, aligning with the Guidelines of Attorney General Number 18 of 2021 at the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office. The entire legal process, from the drafting of the legal opinion by the Public Prosecutor to the issuance of Letter Number B-230/P.4.32/Es.1/08/2022 by the Head of the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office, demonstrates compliance with formal and material completeness. Instructions for resolving the case were subsequently forwarded to the High Attorney’s Office of South Sulawesi. The progression to restorative justice was documented in Letter Number R-/P.4.4/Enz.1/08/2022, issued by the Assistant for General Crimes on behalf of the Head of the High Attorney’s Office of South Sulawesi. Sofyan Setiawan then effectively underwent rehabilitation from August 3 to December 3, 2022, at the Baddoka Narcotic Rehabilitation Center in Makassar. Therefore, several recommendations can be proposed to the relevant stakeholders. First, the Head of the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office and the High Attorney’s Office of South Sulawesi should collaborate to identify the formal and material completeness criteria enabling broader implementation of restorative justice. Second, the Assistant for General Crimes and the Public Prosecutor are advised to develop a systematic evaluation mechanism to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation as one of the options for resolving narcotic criminal cases. Third, the Baddoka Narcotic Rehabilitation Center in Makassar and relevant institutions in Makassar are recommended to enhance the capacity of their facilities and rehabilitation services, especially considering the high number of narcotic cases. These measures aim to improve the effectiveness and scope of restorative justice in handling similar cases in the future.
Co-Authors Ismail Iskandar Muhammad Topan Abadi Nur Azisa Resky Ayu Lestari Syarif Saddam Rivanie Syarif Saddam Rivanie Parawansa Ulil Amri