Balthasar Watunglawar
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN DAN KOMUNIKASI TERHADAP KINERJA APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA (ASN) PADA SEKSI WILAYAH 1 BALAI PENGAMANAN DAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM MALUKU PAPUA Adrianus Mosa; Balthasar Watunglawar; Muhammad Husni Arifin
SOSCIED Vol 5 No 1 (2022): SOSCIED - Juli 2022
Publisher : LPPM Politeknik Saint Paul Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32531/jsoscied.v5i1.370

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyze the influence of Leadership and , Communication on Employee performance. To achieve these objectives, this study uses quantitative research methods. Data were collected through questionnaires and documentation of 30 respondents analyzed using SPSS 22. The results showed that there was a significant influence between leadership, communication on employee performance. So to improve employee performance, the organization and institutional management must pay attention to improving good leadership and communication. The findings of this study are expected to be useful for further researchers in the fields of management, accounting, administration and economics.
SEA EXECUTIONS AS AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION TO ELIMINATING OF THE DEATH PENALTY AND MINIMIZING CRIME Balthasar Watunglawar; Katarina Leba
SOSCIED Vol 5 No 1 (2022): SOSCIED - Juli 2022
Publisher : LPPM Politeknik Saint Paul Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32531/jsoscied.v5i1.441

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find, describe, and conduct a critical analysis of the Sea Execution and the Death Penalty. The research method used is philosophical hermeneutics. Data collected through observation, documentation, and interviews were described, interpreted, reflected, compared, and analyzed critically. The results of this study informed the perception that the death penalty was not effective in dealing with crime. The death penalty was a moral crime because it was against human rights. Life was a right. There was no right to die. Death was associated with the Creator or Ruler taking back what had been given to man. Whoever gave, he was the one who had the authority to take it. If God Almighty was believed to be the giver of life, then God was the one who had the right to take back that life. A natural death, without the intervention of other parties, was evidence of taking rights which was the authority of God. God had never delegated this authority to anyone, including the State. Therefore, the death penalty contradicted the ideology of the State and the 1945 Constitution, so could not be used as a legal tool in eradicating crime. The execution of the sea was a solution to abolish the death penalty, because God used the execution of the sea in saving and converting humans, even though it was seen from a certain perspective as God's way of eradicating evil. Execution of the sea respected the authority of God and had freed State from mral evil.
The Death Penalty In Indonesia: A Theological Perspective of Law Katarina Leba; Yohanes Endi; Balthasar Watunglawar; Fransesco Agnes Ranubaya
International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy & Theology Vol 4, No 1 (2023): June
Publisher : Asosiasi Ahli Filsafat Keilahian Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47043/ijipth.v4i1.40

Abstract

This study aims to explore, analyze and describe the theological perspective on the death penalty and God's way of eradicating evil to answer whether the death penalty can be justified theologically. This research used a descriptive qualitative method. Through this literature review, data are collected and analyzed theologically. The study results found that crime and the death penalty are human products. Evil is the output or impact of human sin. God's works are always related to goodness and the best judgment of God's creations. Evil, including the death penalty, could not be justified because God did not want evil for His creation. Therefore, when humans fell into sin, God ceaselessly saved and converted humans as he sent His only begotten son, willing to die to atone for human sins or save them. In addition to the sacrifice of Jesus, God's way of eradicating evil is also: willingness to suffer, application of sank and rules, forgiveness, radical love, and following Jesus. Theologically, the death penalty is evil, so it cannot be accepted because, for Thomas Aquinas, all forms of the law might be placed in the context of the bonum commune, with the principle of “bonum est faciendum et prosequendum et malum vitandum.” God’s sincerity to suffering must be how humans convert and save fellow humans. Likewise, legal products must align with the goals of the common good and welfare. This research uses a qualitative method. The problem limitation in this article is regarding the legal theological perspective on the death penalty in Indonesia. The findings of this study show that the death penalty is undoubtedly contrary to Thomas Aquinas' moral-theological principle in which God seeks to save humanity, not destroy it.