Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Penerapan Percobaan Sains Terhadap Perkembangan Kognitif Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun di RA Atto’ah Desa Sipatuhu Kecamatan Banding Agung Kabupaten OKU Selatan Endang Winarti; Fahmi Fahmi
Raudhatul Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini Vol 5 No 2 (2021): Raudhatul Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini
Publisher : PIAUD Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/ra.v5i2.11233

Abstract

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan percobaan sains terhadap perkembangan kognitif anak usia 5-6 tahun di RA Atto’ah desa Sipatuhu Kecamatan Banding Agung Kabupaten OKU Selatan tahun 2021. Subjek penelitian seluruh anak kelas B yaitu B1 sebagai kelas kontrol dengan jumlah 15 anak dan B2 sebagai kelas eksperimen dengan jumlah 15 anak. Metode penelitian menggunakan Quasi Ekeperimental Design, dengan pendekatan penelitian kuantitatif “Nonequivalent Control Group Design”. Peneliti mengumpulkan data menggunakan tes, observasi dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji normalitas, uji homogenitas dan uji hipotesis t test. Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh, dapat diketahui bahwa terdapat perbedaan nilai rata-rata setelah di lakukan penerapan percobaan sains dimana nilai rata-rata kelompok kontrol 54,59 sedangkan kelompok eksperimen 72,67 kemudian hasil perhitungan uji t dimana nilai thitung>ttabel(4,5107>2,048), maka kesimpulannya terdapat pengaruh penerapan percobaan sains terhadap perkembangan kognitif anak usia 5-6 tahun di Desa Sipatuhu Kecamatan Banding Agung Kabupaten OKU Selatan Tahun 2021.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERATURAN MENGENAI PENCABUTAN PERMOHONAN KASASI DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERDATA Endang Winarti
Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 3, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (122.88 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT            If the parties are not satisfied a civil litigant against a High Court ruling and do not want to accept the decision, he may apply to the Supreme Court of Cassation within the meaning of Act No. 3 of 2009 on on the Second Amendment Act No. 14 of 1985 on the Supreme Court. The appeal is entitled to the litigants themselves, because it was he who acted as a material, which is directly involved in the conflict are sued (to be a party to the conflict).            Appeal does is aimed to assess whether the lower levels of the judge's decision, whether the decision dibuattelah accordance with the provisions of law and procedural law, so that the litigants get justice fairest. Cassation judge's ruling also allows the improvement caused by the judge 's own fault or human error, because the judges are also human nature that can make mistakes.            Another issue with respect to these issues is concerned repeal cassation appeal itself, where the legislation does not provide further details on the matter. According to the Supreme Court 's jurisprudence, that revocation appeal is allowed as long as the decision was not handed down by the Supreme Court, if there is an appeal of the revocation of both the litigants, the proceedings in the Supreme Court not be done or stopped, but if only one party only cassation petition is revoked, while others who also did not revoke the petition filed cassation appeal, cassation proceedings levels remain to be done. Revocation appeal, should be strictly regulated and clearly in the National Civil Procedure, so that revocation appeal made by the litigants do not harm any of the parties who were also litigants in the case, so that the revocation appeal is conducted aiming to resolve cases exists and is not intended to harm the litigants.