Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ALAMTANA: JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT UNW MATARAM MATH-EDU: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Matematika Fraktal: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika JURNAL PENGABDIAN PENDIDIKAN MASYARAKAT (JPPM)
Zulkaidah Nur Ahzan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Fraktal: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika

 1 
Analisis kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VIII SMPS Katolik Putri St. Xaverius Kefamenanu Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021 Desiana Ukat; Talisadika S. Maifa; Zulkaidah Nur Ahzan
Fraktal : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 2 No 2 (2021): November 2021
Publisher : Universitas Nusa Cendana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (345.428 KB) | DOI: 10.35508/fractal.v2i2.5670

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the critical thinking skills of eighth grade junior high school students class VIII on several materials consisting of 12 student. This type of research is descriptive research with a quilitative approach. The data collected in the form of critical thinking ability test result and interviews. Furthermore, the data collected was analyzed based on the indicators of critical thinking skills that have been set by the researcher which includes interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference. The results of data analysis obtained results, namely (a) On indicators with high thinking skills can interpret well, student with moderate abilities can also interpret well while students with low abilities have not interpreted well; (b) On indicators of analysis, all research subjects from students with high, medium and low abilities have not been able to analyze well;(c) On evaluation and inference indicators, students with high abilities can evaluate and inference well, students with moderate abilities can also evaluate and inference well while students with low abilities have not been able to do evaluation and inference well.
Co-Authors Agustina Aek Desiana Ukat Ermelinda Nainhas Fitriani Fitriani Hesni Neno Maifa, Talisadika Serrisanti Meilandus Bertus Bitin Prudensius Manek Rut Tae Siahaan, Meiva Marthaulina Lestari Stanislaus Amsikan Sulasri Suddin Wua Laja, Yosepha Patricia Yuliana Serli Danul