Adrianus Gupta Wijaya
Universitas Nusa Cendana

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Relationship Between Hypertension And Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 With Benign Prostate Hyperplasia In Mgr. Gabriel Manek Hospital Atambua Adrianus Gupta Wijaya; Arley Sadra Telussa
Cendana Medical Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2021): Cendana Medical Journal
Publisher : Universitas Nusa Cendana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (680.59 KB) | DOI: 10.35508/cmj.v9i2.5968

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between hypertension (HT) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM type 2) with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).Material & methods:This is a case control study with group A (case) consist of 78 BPH patient and group B (control) consist of 78 non BPH patient. DM and HT status from each group was collected. Correlation between each variables and odds ratio was analyzed.Results: Mean age was 66.09 ± 9.05 and 63.40 ± 9.83 years in group A and group B respectively. There is a statistical significant correlation between HT (0.001) and DM (0.021) with BPH (p<0.05). Patient with hypertension are 7.8 times more likely to suffer from BPH (OR 7.882) and patient with DM are 3 times more likely to suffer from BPH.Conclusion: HT and DM type 2 are significantly related to BPH incidence in Mgr. Gabriel Manek Hospital. Patient with HT and DM type 2 are more likely to suffer from BPH. Prevention and management of HT and DM type 2 may help to reduce the incidence of BPH.
Serial Cases Report : 3 Cases Of Giant Bladder Stone In Dilumilpublic Health Center, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia Adrianus Gupta Wijaya; Arley Sadra Telussa
Cendana Medical Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2021): Cendana Medical Journal
Publisher : Universitas Nusa Cendana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (885.132 KB) | DOI: 10.35508/cmj.v9i2.5977

Abstract

Giant bladder stone is a rare case of urinary tract stones. This case usually occurs because of delayed diagnosis due to limited medical facility. Cases Three cases of giant bladder stone were reported in Dilumil Public Health Center, East Nusa Tenggara. All patients are male. The first patient is 40 years old with a 9 x 8.7 x 6 cm bladder stone and that weighed 425 g. The second patient is 19 years old with a 6 x 5.5 x 5.5cm bladder stone and that weighed 116.5g. The third patient is 18 years old with 4.8 x 3.8 x 3.7cm stone and that weighed 105g. Two of three patient’s main complaint was urinary retention, while other patient complained of dysuria. All cases were treated with open vesicolithotomy. Conclusion Giant bladder stone weighing > 100g is uncommon. Initial careful diagnosis is needed to prevent delays in handling bladder stones in primary health facilities. These patients live in the same area and share the drinking water source. The bladder stone was removed by open vesicolithotomy without any complications.