Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mekintek : Jurnal Mekanikal, Energi, Industri, Dan Teknologi
Alvin Hogan M. Situmorang
University of North Sumatra
Aerospace Engineering Astronomy Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparative Analysis Of Cellular Beam And Honeycomb Beam With Anasys Program Alvin Hogan M. Situmorang
Jurnal Mekintek : Jurnal Mekanikal, Energi, Industri, Dan Teknologi Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): April: Mechanical, Energy, Industrial And Technology
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (414.887 KB) | DOI: 10.35335/mekintek.v12i1.17

Abstract

Steel is one of the most widely used construction materials. Along with the development of technology in the field of construction, many variations have been made in the use of steel as a construction material to make it more suitable for the needs and economical in terms of cost. One of the innovations that is often used in steel is to make holes in the body to increase the height of the steel profile. The shape of the hole that is usually formed on the body varies. The most frequently used variations are the hexagon shape (honeycomb beam) and the circular beam (cellular beam). In this study, we will compare the honeycomb beam and the cellular beam. The two beams will be made in several variations with D/Do and S/Do parameters. The experiment was carried out using the ANSYS program. Comparisons are made to find a beam that has a better ability than the parameter variations on the two beams From the results of the study, it was found that the best parameter variations were D/Do = 1.6 and S/Do = 1.08 for honeycomb beam. For cellular beam D/Do = 1.6 and S/Do = 1.28 which is better. Then from the comparison of cellular beam and honeycomb beam, it is found that the honeycomb beam is better.
Co-Authors