Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DIKDAS MATAPPA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesian Collaboration Journal of Community Services (ICJCS)
Utami Novita Lestari
STAI Al Fithrah Surabaya
Humanities Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : DIKDAS MATAPPA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar

 1 
Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Pembelajaran IPA Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Utami Novita Lestari; Rohana Sufia; Ficky Dewi Ixfina; Risma Firda Diana
DIKDAS MATAPPA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Juni
Publisher : STKIP Andi Matappa Pangkep

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31100/dikdas.v6i2.2694

Abstract

Learning implementation practically changes. Students are no longer the object of learning. The success of education is also determined by the teachers’ quality. If teachers can understand the process of acquiring knowledge, then they can determine appropriate learning strategies or methods, one of which is guided inquiry. Guided inquiry is a method that involves students actively discovering concepts independently. Research objective was to determine the implementation effect of the guided inquiry method on science learning outcomes in grade 5th of MI Al-Ghozali Surabaya. This research used quantitative methods. The research population was 39 students. The sampling technique used non-probability sampling. Data collection used interview sheets and tests. The data analysis used Pearson product moment and t-table test. The results showed, value of t-table 37 was 1.68. This shows t-count>t-table = 1.91>1.68. So Ho was accepted and it stated that there was an increase in student learning outcomes. Besides, rxy is bigger than r-table = 0.33617>0.316. It can be concluded that the guided inquiry method has a low effect on increasing student learning outcomes. This is also supported by the results of the coefficient of determination 11.3%, the remaining 88.7% (100% -11.3%) is influenced by other variables which were not examined by researchers.
Co-Authors A’izzani Sri Wilujeng Abadi Ficky Dewi Ixfina Nahdiatul Ummah Risma Firda Diana ROHANA SUFIA Tuti Marlina