Achmad Sulchan
Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Credit Agreement and Notary-PPAT Responsibilities for Deed of Mortgage Muhammad Azka Faizan; Achmad Sulchan
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 2, No 3 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (784.885 KB) | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.2.3.187-195

Abstract

Banks are one financial institution that has an important role in the economy of a country. The problems in this study are (1) What are the factors that hamper the credit agreement and the responsibility of the Notary-PPAT in making the Deed of Granting Mortgage to the BPD Bank of Central Java?, 2) What is the legal consequence if the Notary-PPAT is late in making the Deed of Granting Mortgage to Bank BPD Central Java?, 3) How is the settlement if the Notary-PPAT is late in making the Deed of Granting Mortgage to the Bank BPD Central Java? The method used is the sociological juridical approach, the research specification is analytical descriptive. The results of this study are (1) The cost of increasing SKMHT to APHT because the process of certification of SKMHT objects that have not been registered requires expensive costs. 2) Based on that, SKMHT needs to be regenerated if APHT is to be made. 3) By making a new Power of Attorney Charge (SKMHT), which of course must be with the approval of creditors and debtors.
Roles and Responsibilities Analysis of Substitution Notary Before Leaving Period Andi Deny Zulkifli Nur; Achmad Sulchan
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 2, No 2 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (516.031 KB) | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.2.2.63-68

Abstract

This research aims: 1) To find out the legal status of a substitution notary related to the notary who was replaced by a death before the leave ends. 2) Also to understand the administrative settlement mechanism for the Substitution notary Protocol related to the replaced Notary Public before the leave period ends. The research method used is Normative and Descriptive in nature which is supported by primary data and also references to books and related laws in the case of Substitute Notaries. Normative legal research is based on the logic of legal science from the normative side. It is descriptive in nature to present a complete picture of a problem and be described clearly. Based on the research, it is concluded that: In Article 35 paragraph 3 UUJN-P, namely that if the notary dies while on leave, then the duties of his office will be carried out by a substitution notary as a Notary's Temporary Officer no later than 30 (thirty) days from the date of the Notary's death. The administrative settlement mechanism for the Substitution notary Protocol, namely as a Notary Temporary Officer, has expired his term of office. The Regional Supervisory Council, then within 14 (fourteen) days from the end of the term of office of the Temporary Notary Officer, it is required to appoint a Notary as the recipient of the Notary protocol. Pursuant to Article 35 paragraph (4) UUJN-P that the Substitution notary Public as Temporary Officer of Notary Public has a period of submission of the Notary Public Protocol and the Substitution notary Public is no longer than 60 days from the death of the Notary Public.