Nanette C. Kingma
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

A GIS MODELLING APPROACH FOR FLOOD HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN PART OF SURAKARTA CITY, INDONESIA Tipuk Purwandari; M. Pramono Hadi; Nanette C. Kingma
Indonesian Journal of Geography Vol 43, No 1 (2011): Indonesian Journal of Geography
Publisher : Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/ijg.2296

Abstract

This research is aimed to assess the flood hazard in part of Surakarta usinghydrodynamic modelling. Flo2D software is used to simulate the flood for 10, 25and 100 year return period. The modeling results include two flood parameters, i.ewater depth and flow velocity. A comparison was made in flood hazard mappingbetween single parameter and multi parameters. The multi parameters hazardmaps improve the reliability of the hazard class delineation. The impact assessmentis done in two point of view, human safety and property damage. The furtherimpact assessment is done by calculating the number of buildings affected by flood.
COMMUNITY BASED APPROACH TO ASSESS FLOOD RISK PERCEPTION ALONG CODE RIVER Diah Noor Heryanti; Nanette C. Kingma
Indonesian Journal of Geography Vol 44, No 2 (2012): Indonesian Journal of Geography
Publisher : Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/ijg.2395

Abstract

This p a p e r presents a flood risk perception and coping mechanism along CodeRiver, Yogyakarta Municipality based on the community approach. A total of 90households were interviewed. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for theSocial Sciences (SPSS) Program. The result indicated that there are no differencesof flood risk perception among the zones (p >.05). Perception of flood risk is influencedby several variables: gender, length of stay, RW’s risk level, distance betweenrespondents’ house and river and impact level of flood. Whereas, all types of community’scoping mechanism (technological, social, and economical) are influenced by impact levelof flood.
Analysis Community’s Coping Strategies and Local Risk Governance Framework in Relation to Landslide Heru Setiawan; Nanette C. Kingma; C.J. van Westen
Indonesian Journal of Geography Vol 46, No 2 (2014): Indonesian Journal of Geography
Publisher : Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1290.461 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/ijg.5784

Abstract

Analysis of people perception and analysis of the coping strategy to landslides are the two elements that are es-sential to determine the level of preparedness of communities to landslides. To know the preparedness of government and other stakeholders in facing landslide, the analysis risk governance framework was required. A survey using questionnaires with random sampling was applied to assess the level of people perception and people coping strategy related to landslide. Analysis of risk governance frame work was done at the district and sub-district level. ἀe study found that people perception related with landslide dominated by high and moderate level. Age and education are two factors that inḀuence the people’s perception to landslide. Local people applied four types coping strategy, which are: economic, structural, social and cultural coping strategy. Totally, 51.6% respondents have high level, 33.3% have moderate level and only 15.1% respondents that have low level of coping strategy. ἀe factors that inḀuence the level of coping strategy are education, income and building type.  Analysis of risk governance framework is limited to the three components including stakeholder involvement, risk management and risk communication. Based on the data analysis, the level of stakeholder involvement at the district scope was categorized on the moderate till high and the level of stakeholder involvement at sub-district level was categorized on the high level. Generally, the risk management of Karanganyar was categorized on the moderate level and high level and the risk management in Tawangmangu was categorized on the moderate level. ἀere are some elements must be improved on the risk governance framework, those are data management, the pattern of relationships among stakeholders, increased participation of NGOs, constructed and updated landslide risk map, enhancement of microᴀnance role in helping the com-munity when disaster strikes and  dissemination of information about the landslide to the local community.