<![CDATA[This research aim is to know, 1) where give better influence, convensional learning or jigsaw toward learning acievement? 2) ) where give better influence in learning,student with high motivation,medium and low toward study acievement trig matery? 3) for student with various motivation, where learning model give batter influence, konvensional leaming or Jigsaw toward study trig acievement? Population in this research is all of eighth Mts Abu Darrin Kendal, in the academic year of 201312014 is many as 109 students divided become 4 class, with detail of class VIIIa consist from 28 students, VIIIb, VIIIc and VIIId this all class consist from 27 students. Be based on result cluster random sampling, class become sample in the research is class VIIIa as experiment class and VIIIc as control class. Technique of analyzing the data in this research use variance two street analysis with difference sel. Prerequisite test involve the use of research analysis of data is normalitas test with Lilliefors methode and homogenitas test with Bartleet methode. Conclusion: 1). Leaming Mathematics Achievement of students teachable used Jigsaw Learning better than conventional learning, 2). Learning Mathematics Achievement of students with high motivation better then medium and low motivation. Such Leaming Mathematics Achievement of students with medium motivation be better then low motivation. 3). There is not interaction between leaming methode with students motivation, so Learning Mathematics Achievement of students with high, medium and low motivation teachable used Jigsaw Learning better than conventional learning.]]>
