Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : PERSPEKTIF

Policy Implementation of Asahan Regent Regulation No. 3 of 2019 Concerning Adjustment of Retribution Rates for Parking Services on Public Roads in the Asahan Regency Area Hatta Syahputra; Budi Hartono; Dumasari Harahap
PERSPEKTIF Vol. 12 No. 4 (2023): PERSPEKTIF, October
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/perspektif.v12i4.9819

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Policy Implementation of Asahan Regent Regulation Number 3 of 2019 Concerning Adjustment of Retribution Rates for Parking Services on Public Roadsides in the Asahan Regency Area and the obstacles. This research uses a qualitative descriptive research type, which is a method that describes and explains the results in the field in the form of words between sentences which are then drawn conclusions from the description. Based on the results of interviews and observations in the field which were then analyzed in this study, the results and conclusions of the parking levy policy on public roads in Asahan Regency have not been implemented properly. parking fees that are not in accordance with the provisions of the regulations and people who do not pay according to the rates, then the indicators for collecting fees in this study are still found by parking officers who do not use complete attributes in collecting fees. Then the indicators of supervision and sanctions, the results of the surveillance research conducted by the Department of Transportation are quite good but there are still violations committed by parking attendants.
Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedure in Divorce Cases During the Covid-19 Pandemic at Religious Courts in Medan City Kusmalina; Budi Hartono; Dumasari Harahap
PERSPEKTIF Vol. 12 No. 4 (2023): PERSPEKTIF, October
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/perspektif.v12i4.10175

Abstract

This study undertakes an analysis of the implementation of Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedure I in the settlement of divorce cases during the COVID-19 pandemic at Religious Courts in Medan City, while also identifying inhibiting factors. A descriptive qualitative research method is employed due to the nuanced nature of the issues at hand. Key informants (Vice Chairman of the Religious Courts in Medan City), main informants (mediators), and additional informants (court clerks) constitute the research subjects. Data collection methods encompass observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis includes data reduction, presentation, conclusion drawing, and verification, with data validity confirmed through triangulation. The implementation of Perma No. 1 of 2016 is evaluated through the lens of Edward III's theory, encompassing communication, disposition, resources, and bureaucratic structure. However, the appointment of mediator judges remains suboptimal. Mediation of divorce cases at the Religious Courts in Medan City is perceived as less effective, supported by the limited number of successfully mediated cases. Inhibiting factors include the scarcity of mediator judges, inadequate accessibility to mediation rooms for many individuals, and a lack of public awareness regarding the significance of mediation in case settlements.