Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities
Agung Dwi Pramono
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Malpractice of Notary Law Profession in the Form of Authentic Deed Forgery (Denpasar District Court Decision Study Number 89/Pid.B.2020/Pn Dps) Agung Dwi Pramono; Kuswardani
Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): August-Dec
Publisher : Konsorsium LPPM Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah (PTMA) Koordinator Wilayah Jawa Tengah - DIY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (110.645 KB) | DOI: 10.53017/ujsah.87

Abstract

Notaries are public offcial who carrying out their duties and authorities are based on the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and impartiality. There is even a Notary in Denpasar Bali who commits a violation as stated in the Judge's Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps.The purpose of the research to describes the Judge’s Decision from the act aspect and malpraktice form in criminal law perspective. The research is doctrinal, then secondary data is as main data (reference, legal document that are relevant to the problems). Data collecting through library research. Data analysis using criminal law principles. The result show that the act of notary in the Judge’s Decision accordance with Article 264 paragraph (1) and (2) jo Article 56 of the Penal Code. Therefor a notary makes a mistake and must be responsible. Furthemore, the act of notary is called criminal malpractice, but also standart of conduct.
Malpractice of Notary Law Profession in the Form of Authentic Deed Forgery (Denpasar District Court Decision Study Number 89/Pid.B.2020/Pn Dps) Agung Dwi Pramono; K Kuswardani
Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): August-Dec
Publisher : Konsorsium LPPM Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah (PTMA) Koordinator Wilayah Jawa Tengah - DIY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53017/ujsah.87

Abstract

Notaries are public offcial who carrying out their duties and authorities are based on the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and impartiality. There is even a Notary in Denpasar Bali who commits a violation as stated in the Judge's Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps.The purpose of the research to describes the Judge’s Decision from the act aspect and malpraktice form in criminal law perspective. The research is doctrinal, then secondary data is as main data (reference, legal document that are relevant to the problems). Data collecting through library research. Data analysis using criminal law principles. The result show that the act of notary in the Judge’s Decision accordance with Article 264 paragraph (1) and (2) jo Article 56 of the Penal Code. Therefor a notary makes a mistake and must be responsible. Furthemore, the act of notary is called criminal malpractice, but also standart of conduct.
Co-Authors K Kuswardani Kuswardani