<![CDATA[AbstrakSetiap model pembelajaran kooperatif memiliki karakteristik dalam menerapkan enam prinsip pembelajaran kooperatif termasuk model Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) dan Numbered Heads Together (NHT). Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui manakah yang menghasilkan hasil belajar yang lebih baik diantara (1) model TAI dan NHT, (2) tingkat kecerdasan interpersonal, dan (3) interaksi model pembelajaran TAI dan NHT dengan kecerdasan interpersonal. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA N 1 Salatiga Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019 (384 siswa). Melalui teknik cluster random sampling diperoleh 30 siswa kelas X IPS 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dan 34 siswa kelas X IPS 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 dengan perbedaan perlakuan dalam pembelajaran trigonometri. Penelitian eksperimen semu ini menggunakan randomized control group pretest-postest design. Uji hipotesis menyimpulkan (1) hasil belajar siswa dengan model TAI secara signifikan lebih baik daripada NHT, (2) tidak ada perbedaan hasil belajar yang signifikan dari tingkat kecerdasan interpersonal yang berbeda, (3) tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan kecerdasan interpersonal terhadap hasil belajar. AbstractEach type of cooperative learning model has different characteristics in applying 6 principles of cooperative learning, including TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and NHT (Numbered Head Together) type models. This study aimed to find out: (1) which learning outcomes are better between students using the TAI or NHT models, (2) which learning outcomes are better between students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence levels, (3) is there any correlation between TAI and NHT learning models with interpersonal intelligence on student learning outcomes. The population in this study were all students of X grade at SMA N 1 Salatiga in the Academic Year 2018/2019 (384 students). Through assembling random sampling techniques obtained students of class X IPS 1 (30 students) as experimental class I and students of class X IPS 2 (34 students) as experimental class II with different treatment in learning mathematics on trigonometry material. This quasi-experimental research used a randomized control group pretest-posttest design. Hypothesis test results concluded that (1) student learning outcomes with the TAI model were significantly better than student learning outcomes with the NHT model, (2) there was no significant difference between student learning outcomes of different levels of interpersonal intelligence, (3) there were no interactions between models learning with interpersonal intelligence on student learning outcomes.]]>
