Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Ali Sodiqin
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Maqasid Sharia Perspective in Changes the Marriage Age Limits for Women According to Law Number 16 of 2019 Darlin Rizki; Frina Oktalita; Ali Sodiqin
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 7, No 2 November (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (754.958 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v7i2.4016

Abstract

This study analyzes the changes to Law no. 16 of 2019 on Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning the age limit of marriage. There are various responses in society, socio-cultural clashes and even religion cannot be avoided, where this situation is increasingly difficult to achieve the goal of marriage. This raises the question, why is it necessary to rearrange the age limits for marriage, and what background causes it? This study uses the maqasid sharia approach with the System theory of Jasser Auda. This type of research is descriptive qualitative using the maqasid sharia approach. The object of study is Law no. 19 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This study uses secondary data from two sources. First, the primary source is taken from the text of the Law and the Decision of the Constitutional Court. Second, secondary sources such as books, journals, reports, magazines, newspapers, and so on. Then the data are interpreted and analyzed descriptively. The results of this study showed that the determination of changes to the law regarding the age limit for marriage can be classified into the interests of al-dharurriyah (primary), which are important and must be fulfilled to achieve the goals of sharia, namely safety. The analysis of maqasid sharia with six subsystem features explains that protected interests are closely related, which are related to one another, representing age differences in marriage, which is a form of discrimination. The scope of the provisions on the age limit for marriage is classified as maqasid ‘ammah, because it covers all the interests of women in Indonesia. Also, as maqasid khassah, legal protection from the fulfillment of basic rights and constitutional rights as citizens. The level of dharuriyah does not always have the implication of obligatory syar'i (causing sin) but only until obligatory hukm (must), because the legal provisions are explored by mujtahids and are based on the absence of qat'y texts on this issue.
SOCIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION BY RELIGIOUS COURT JUDGES: Views of Bantul Religious Court Judges on the Husband's Financial Capability Requirement for Polygamy Alfi Syahrin; Ali Sodiqin; Abdul Rahim Hakimi
Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 15, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ahwal.2022.15203

Abstract

The legal substance in the Government Regulation on Marriage Law Implementation, particularly on financial requirements for polygamy, allows the emergence of ambiguous interpretations for judges. Article 41, paragraph C, of that regulation, does not specify how judges should assess the financial strength of a husband who intends to engage in a polygamous marriage. Likewise, the Bantul Religious Court judges (who granted the most polygamy permits in Yogyakarta of 2021) have a different perspective on the requirements for financial ability in polygamy. In this context, this study examines how Bantul Religious Court judges deal with this legal ambiguity in their decisions. This study examines 14 polygamy verdicts. This research finds that the concept of financial ability in the polygamy case is the judge's way of measuring the justice of the husband. Justice primarily refers to the husband's capability to provide an adequate financial portion of the fair share to their wife (in the future). To know the husband's financial ability, judges apply a holistic approach that rests on a sociological lens.[Substansi hukum dalam Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Perkawinan, khususnya tentang persyaratan keuangan untuk poligami, memungkinkan munculnya penafsiran ganda bagi hakim. Pasal 41 huruf C peraturan itu tidak mengatur bagaimana seharusnya hakim menilai kekuatan keuangan seorang suami yang hendak melakukan perkawinan poligami. Begitu pula dengan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Bantul (yang paling banyak memberikan izin poligami di DIY tahun 2021) memiliki pandangan yang berbeda tentang syarat kemampuan finansial dalam poligami. Dalam konteks tersebut, penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana Hakim Pengadilan Agama Bantul menyikapi ambiguitas hukum tersebut dalam putusannya. Studi ini mengkaji 14 vonis poligami. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa konsep kemampuan finansial dalam kasus poligami merupakan cara hakim mengukur keadilan suami. Keadilan terutama mengacu pada kemampuan suami untuk memberikan porsi keuangan yang memadai dari bagian yang adil kepada istri mereka (di masa depan). Untuk mengetahui kemampuan finansial suami, hakim menerapkan pendekatan holistik yang berpijak pada lensa sosiologis.]
Co-Authors Abdul Rahim Hakimi Alfi Syahrin Darlin Rizki Frina Oktalita