Muzakkir Muzakkir
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

The Analysis of the Decisions of the Sharia Court Judges on Child Rape Cases in the City of Langsa Muzakkir Muzakkir
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 7, No 2 November (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (677.148 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v7i2.4922

Abstract

This study analyzes of the Decisions of the Sharia Court Judges on Child Rape Cases in the City of Langsa Number 33/JN/2021/MS.Lgs, which gave a prison sentence for perpetrators of raping biological children, this type of research is qualitative using empirical normative legal methods (application) that will analyze the written law and apply it at the time of the case. Research is a type of normative research using a case approach; the primary data source is in the form of a first-level decision that was tried by the Mahkamah Syar’iyah of Langsa City Number 33/JN/2021 /MS.Lgs, as for the research findings, the judge gave a decision based on the Qanun Jinayat with a fine of 165 months in prison because the victim in his request to be tried by the Qanun jinayat. The things that burden the uqubat for the perpetrators are: The defendant's actions did not support the Aceh Provincial government's program in enforcing Islamic Shari'a in Aceh Province; The Defendant's actions caused anxiety and damaged the future of the Victim's Child; The defendant is the biological father of the victim's child who is supposed to protect and guide the victim's child; and while the mitigating factors for the perpetrator are that the defendant is polite at trial and has never been convicted.