Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LEGAL BRIEF
Musdayanti
Universitas Hasanuddin
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Evidence for the Crime of Money Laundering That Does Not Require Preliminary Proof of the Predicate Crime Musdayanti; Abd. Asis; Audyna Mayasari Muin
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Desember: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.651 KB) | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v11i5.517

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the the Legislative Ratio Article 69 UURI No. 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering that Does Not Require Proof of Excess Preliminary Crime in the Crime of Money Laundering. The research was conducted using a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the process of handling money laundering cases is essentially very dependent on the original crime as contained in the provisions of Article 2 UURI No. 8 of 2010 which is an element in the crime of money laundering must come from a criminal act. In line with the above basis, Article 69 has been formulated which reads “In order to be able to carry out investigations, prosecutions, examinations in court proceedings against the crime of money laundering, it is not necessary to first prove the original crime”. Where the crime of money laundering can be investigated, prosecuted, and brought to court without having to first prove the original crime and not having to wait for the verdict of the predicate crime which has permanent legal force (inkracht).
Co-Authors Abd Asis Audyna Mayasari Muin