Yoga Wahyu Pratiwi
Universitas Islam Jember Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Medis dan Pasien Pada Tindakan Gawat Darurat Muhammad Afiful Jauhani; Yoga Wahyu Pratiwi; supianto supianto
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/rechtens.v11i2.1790

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga medis dan pasien terhadap tindakan gawat darurat dalam perspektif hukum pidana dan dalam perspektif hukum perdata. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pasien yang mendapati kesalahan dokter pada saat melakukan tindakan kedokteran dalam situasi gawat darurat dan perbuatan tersebut memenuhi unsur pidana maka pasien dapat menuntut pertanggungjawaban dokter secara pidana, namun sesuai asas ultimum remedium, hukum pidana hendaklah dijadikan upaya terakhir dalam hal penegakan hukum. Dalam perspektif hukum perdata, Pasal 58 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Kesehatan menyatakan bahwa tuntutan ganti rugi tidak berlaku bagi tenaga kesehatan yang melakukan tindakan penyelamatan nyawa atau pencegahan kecacatan seseorang dalam keadaan darurat. Pasien yang kepentingannya dirugikan atas tindakan dokter dalam menjalankan praktik kedokteran dapat mengadukan secara tertulis kepada Ketua Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dan tidak menghilangkan hak setiap orang untuk melaporkan adanya dugaan tindak pidana kepada pihak yang berwenang dan/atau menggugat kerugian perdata ke pengadilan.  Kata kunci: Gawat darurat, Medis, Pasien, Perlindungan hukum This study aims to determine the form of legal protection for medical personnel and patients against emergency measures in the perspective of criminal law and in the perspective of civil law. The method used in this research is normative juridical. The results of the study show that patients who find a doctor's mistake when carrying out medical actions in an emergency situation and the act fulfills a criminal element, the patient can hold the doctor accountable criminally, but according to the principle of ultimum remedium, criminal law should be used as a last resort in terms of law enforcement. From a civil law perspective, Article 58 paragraph (2) of the Health Law states that claims for compensation do not apply to health workers who take actions to save lives or prevent someone from becoming disabled in an emergency. Patients whose interests are harmed by the doctor's actions in carrying out medical practice can complain in writing to the Chairman of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council and do not eliminate the right of everyone to report suspected criminal acts to the authorities and/or sue for civil damages to court.  Keywords: Emergency, Medical, Patient, Legal protection   REFERENCES Bickenbach, Jerome. “WHO’s Definition of Health: Philosophical Analysis.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine, edited by Thomas Schramme and Steven Edwards, 1–14. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_48-1. Buamona, Hasrul. “Tanggung Jawab Pidana Dokter Dalam Kesalahan Medis.” Almazahib 2, no. 2 (2014): 215–38. Chazawi, Adami. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2002. Dini, Sandra, and Febri Aristya. “Pembuktian Perdata Dalam Kasus Malpraktik Di Yogyakarta.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 0, no. 0 (2011): 180–205. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.361. Dorland. Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary. 33rd ed. Elsevier, 2019. Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary. Thomson Reuters. 11th ed., 2019. Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010. Herkutanto. “Aspek Medikolegal Pelayanan Gawat Darurat.” Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia 57, no. 2 (2007): 37–40. Heuken, Adolf. Ensiklopedi Populer Politik Pembangunan Pancasila. 4th ed. Jakarta: Yayasan Cipta Loka Caraka, 1984. Jauhani, Muhammad Afiful. Dilema Kapabilitas Dan Imparsialitas Dokter Sebagai Mediator Sengketa Medis. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka, 2020. Muntaha. Hukum Pidana Malapraktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017. Nurhayati, Bernadeta Resti. “Perikatan Usaha (Inspanning Verbintenis) Versus Perkatan Hasil (Resultaat Verbintenis) Dalam Perjanjian Terapeutik,” no. November (2018): 1-8. Perwira, Indra. “Memahami Kesehatan Sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Lembaga Studi & Advokasi Masyarakat, 2001, 1–19. Pujiyono, Eko. Keadilan Dalam Perawatan Medis. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2017. Sulistyani, Venny, and Zulhasmar Syamsu. “Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Seorang Dokter Dalam Kasus Malpraktek Medis.” Lex Jurnalica 12, no. 2 (2015). Widjaja, S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien Selaku Konsumen terhadap Tindakan Malpraktik di Bidang Kesehatan. JURNAL RECHTENS, 9(1), hlm.47. https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v9i1.660  https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1134311282?search_mode=content&search_text=jurnal%20rechtens&search_type=kws&search_field=full_search&and_facet_source_title=jour.1406386
Autopsi Forensik Sebagai Upaya Mencapai Kepastian Hukum Pada Kasus Kematian Tidak Wajar Muhammad Afiful Jauhani; Yoga Wahyu Pratiwi; supianto supianto
WELFARE STATE Jurnal Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): APRIL
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/welfarestate.v2i1.2063

Abstract

Autopsy is a medical examination of a corpse to determine the cause of death. Forensic autopsies for judicial purposes have been regulated in Article 133 and Article 134 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, even Article 222 of the Criminal Code has also regulated criminal sanctions against parties who intentionally hinder forensic autopsies, but it is undeniable that there are still obstacles in its implementation. This study aims to analyze the essential role of forensic autopsies for legal certainty through analysis of several court decisions and literature review using normative juridical methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. Forensic autopsies has scientific validity. Application of the principle of causality is very important in law enforcement for a fair and correct decision so that it can fulfill a sense of justice for victims, perpetrators and also the community. The accurate cause of death through a forensic autopsy, is a material justification that can be verified scientifically for discovering the truth.