Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurist-Diction Jurnal Inovasi Pembangunan Strategi Memperkuat Integritas Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia
Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
KOMPLEKSITAS PEMENUHAN HAK PENYANDANG DISABILITAS YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM DI PENGADILAN TINGGI TANJUNG KARANG Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi
Inovasi Pembangunan : Jurnal Kelitbangan Vol 10 No 03 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : Balitbangda Provinsi Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35450/jip.v10i03.317

Abstract

Basically, people with disabilities need to get protection for those who are in conflict with the law in court, especially the Tanjung Karang High Court. In this case, it is necessary to take a deeper look at legal developments in terms of current legislation in order to guarantee the rights of persons with disabilities and also the fulfillment of rights to physical and non-physical accessibility such as building facilities and infrastructure that must be adequate, or even because of employee resources, clerks, and judges in courts who need to understand related to various disability issues. This research is a juridical-normative legal research aimed at finding and formulating legal arguments, through an analysis of the subject matter. The technique of collecting legal materials is carried out by literature studies and field studies. The approach used is the statute approach, to examine the applicable legal rules related to disability, to see the provisions of the legislation and theoretical conceptions of disability with the empirical reality of the fulfillment of the rights of persons with disabilities at the Tanjung Karang High Court. The results show that based on the parameters of Government Regulation Number 39 of 2020 concerning Adequate Accommodation for Persons with Disabilities in the Judicial Process, that physical and non-physical accessibility at the Tanjung Karang High Court has been fulfilled properly, namely having special physical infrastructure and supporting tools. make it easier for persons with disabilities to access all public areas in court. Meanwhile, non-physical accessibility means that court officials have been provided with technical services regarding knowledge and ethics on how to serve persons with disabilities, and are now beginning to understand legal services for persons with disabilities.
Living Law Dalam KUHP: Suatu Gagasan Menginventarisasi Kompilasi Hukum Adat Daffa Ladro Kusworo; Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi
Jurist-Diction Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): Volume 7 No. 3, Juli 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v7i3.56266

Abstract

AbstractThe living law provisions contained in Article 2 Paragraph 1 of the KUHP make customary law to determine whether person can be convicted as balance of national legal system. However, problem lies in inclusion customary offenses in Regional Regulations which are contradictory dynamically moving customary law. However, there is a contradiction in the issue of whether it expands the principle of legality, or violates the principle of legality itself. This study uses normative juridical method that refers to legislation and conceptual approach based on doctrine legal positivism, as well as literature studies from various research literatures, books, journals, and other legal materials. The results show that design follow-up living law in KUHP is more appropriate to do with inventory Compilation Customary Law as convenience for law enforcement officers, especially judges resolve cases by finding value of justice, as well as making it easier for legislators to find actions that will be regulated in regulations. future legislation (ius constituendum).Keywords: Compilation of Customary Law; Living Law; KUHP. AbstrakKetentuan living law yang termuat dalam Pasal 2 Ayat 1 KUHP menjadikan hukum adat dapat menentukan seseorang dapat dipidana sebagai keseimbangan sistem hukum nasional. Namun persoalan terdapat kontradiksinya yang apakah memperluas asas legalitas, atau menyalahi dari asas legalitas itu sendiri. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang mengacu pada perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual yang didasari atas doktrin positivisme hukum, serta studi kepustakan dari berbagai literatur hasil penelitian, buku, jurnal, dan bahan hukum lainnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa desain tindak lanjut living law dalam KUHP lebih tepat dilakukan dengan inventarisasi Kompilasi Hukum Adat sebagai kemudahan bagi aparat penegak hukum, terutama hakim untuk menyelesaikan perkara dengan menggali nilai-nilai keadilan, serta memudahkan pembentuk undang-undang untuk menemukan perbuatan yang akan diatur dalam peraturan perundang undangan di masa yang akan datang (ius constituendum).Kata Kunci: Kompilasi Hukum Adat; Living Law; KUHP.
Diskursus Pemenuhan Kesejahteraan Hakim Sebagai Pencegahan Judicial Corruption Melalui Rancangan Undang-Undang Jabatan Hakim: Studi Komparatif Dengan Negara Amerika dan Kanada Daffa Ladro; Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.167-186

Abstract

Judges' welfare provision has stagnated, affecting their integrity. The increasingly complex problem actually stems from regulations that currently cannot accommodate all financial rights and facilities of judges. For example, in the dynamics related to the amount of basic salary and allowances in Government Regulation No. 94/2012 until its first amendment, it is still said to be very minimal, as well as Decision No. 23 P/HUM/2018 which revoked the basic salary of judges with Civil Servants (PNS) but there was no follow-up after the decision to form a legal umbrella. Financial intervention will certainly have a great potential to occur among judges, when effectiveness is present due to the lack of the state in ensuring the welfare of judges, so that later decisions are given based on how much finance is offered by individuals through transactional activities that lead to judicial corruption. The research method uses normative jurisprudence referring to laws and regulations as well as literature studies in the form of books, journals, and other literature. The research is prescriptive in nature to find ideal ideas accompanied by comparative studies to examine legal systems in other countries. The results show that the problematic system of judges‘ salaries, as well as the limited regulations, need to emulate the United States, which applies constitutional salary protection and prohibits congress from reducing judges’ salaries. In Canada there is a judicial commission function to conduct investigations related to the adequacy of salaries and other amounts that must be disclosed to government-appointed judges periodically. The construction of the regulation of financial rights and facilities of judges needs to pay attention to the principles of judicial remuneration and research related to its effect on improving performance, to be accommodated later in the Judgeship Bill as a legal umbrella to improve the welfare of judges in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Daffa Ladro Daffa Ladro Kusworo