Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science
Nurini APRILIANDA
Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconstruction Of “Obstruction Of Justice” As A Criminal Act In The Law On Eradicating Corruption In Indonesia Samsul HUDA; Bambang SUGIRI; Nurini APRILIANDA; Heru R. HADI
International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science (Nov
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/ijesss.v3i3.260

Abstract

Corruption is a special criminal act, qualified as an ordinary crime but must be eradicated in extraordinary ways. In Indonesia, it is not only an extraordinary method but also an institution with extraordinary authority formed because corruption has become a systemic and systematic disease of society. Criminalizing the act of "obstructing the judicial process" is one way to eradicate corruption extraordinarily. The positive law has already regulated it, but it needs to be strengthened by ratifying UNCAC 2003 so that the norms governing the offense can be universally recognized. This study aims to synchronize and harmonize the norms that have been regulated in positive law with the new norms regulated in UNCAC 2003 to avoid misperceptions in its implementation. The normative method is used by examining philosophically and juridically through principles and theories that develop and are associated with emerging empirical problems. Several legal cases are used to analyze the philosophical and juridical problems and to find weaknesses in the "obstruction of justice" offense norm. It needs to be reconstructed to ensure legal certainty and justice better. In the end, the goal of eradicating corruption can be achieved, without violating the proper criminal procedural law and placing interested parties, both from the perspective of the perpetrators and victims.
The Meaning Of Ultra Qui Judicat Principle And The Validity Of The Verdict In Criminal Cases Suwitno Y IMRAN; Sudarsono SUDARSONO; I Nyoman NURJAYA; Nurini APRILIANDA
International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science (Nov
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/ijesss.v3i3.265

Abstract

The prohibition for judges to not sentence the defendant if the act is not described carefully, clearly and completely in the indictment of the public prosecutor, it turns out that in practice in court, there are judges who deviate from the article charged by the public prosecutor. The judge's action is called the ultra qui judicat principle, that is deviating from what was charged. The main problem in this paper is about the meaning of the Ultra Qui Judicat Principle and the Validity of Decisions in Criminal Cases. The main problems will be analyzed using normative legal research methods using a case approach and data sources from laws and regulations. The results show that the Ultra Qui Judicat Principle is an act of a judge deciding a case by placing justice as the goal of being able to deviate from the indictment of the public prosecutor based on the facts of the trial. This principle then has a specificity in the form of this principle being devoted to judges in deciding criminal cases, the use of this principle emphasizes the justice of judges in deciding criminal cases, and the scope of this principle is found in the facts of the trial. Furthermore, in exploring the meaning or value of the Ultra Qui Judicat principle, it is done by analyzing a judge's verdict, approach to legal expert opinion, and reviewing the legislation.
Co-Authors Bambang SUGIRI Heru R. HADI I Nyoman NURJAYA Samsul Huda Asrori Sudarsono SUDARSONO Suwitno Yutye Imran