Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Pijar MIPA
Kusmiyati Kusmiyati
Biology Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Education Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
An Analysis on Students Problem-Solving Skill and Scientific Literacy Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Viewed from Gender Gito Hadiprayitno; Nur Lestari; Kusmiyati Kusmiyati; Akhmad Sukri; Jono Irawan
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): November
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2287

Abstract

Each student has differences in problem-solving, scientific literacy, and higher-order thinking skills. Gender differences partially influence student mindset. The purpose of this study was to analyze the problem-solving skill and scientific literation of students on different genders. The study adopted and modified the one-shot case study design. The subjects of this study were 76 students who took the Animal Ecology course. Both experimental classes were given treatment using practical activities. Data on students' problem-solving skill were collected by using a test consisting of 25 questions. Whereas scientific literacy was collected by using essay questions. Students’ scientific literacy were categorized into 5 scales that were analyzed by using percentages. Statistical analysis uses descriptive and t-tests to determine differences in problem solving skill on different genders. The results showed that (1) 37.66% of students’ scientific literacy are on a multidimensional and conceptual scale, while the remaining 62.34% were on a functional, nominal and literacy scale, (2) students' problem-solving skill are in the medium category, and there is no difference in problem-solving skill in males and females (p>.05).
Implementation of the self-organized learning environments learning model to enhace learning outcomes and student independence Kusmiyati Kusmiyati
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 18 No. 3 (2023): May 2023
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v18i3.4776

Abstract

This study aims to describe student learning outcomes and independence through SOLE (Self Organized Learning Environments) learning. The subjects of this study were 21 Biology Education students who took the Introductory Education course. Data on learning outcomes were collected using tests, while independence using a non-test with a Likert scale. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively into five categories. Cognitive learning outcomes in the good category were 11 (52%), and very good was 10 (48%) students. The results of the analysis of independence with categories fairly good, good, and very good were 2(10%), 8(32%), and 11(52%) students, respectively. The achievement of student independence on the indicators of not depending on others, self-confidence, discipline, responsibility, and self-control varies from fairly good to very good. In contrast, the self-initiative indicators vary in the good and very good categories. The analysis of the relationship between independence and learning outcomes shows that in all categories, independence shows learning outcomes in very good and good categories. Conclusion: (a) Student cognitive learning outcomes in completing lectures vary in very good and good categories. (b) Students' independence in completing lectures varies from fairly good to very good categories but is dominated by very good categories. (c) student independence in each indicator varies from fairly good to very good, except for the initiative indicator, which is in the good and good categories. (d) the level of student independence determines learning outcomes that vary in very good and good categories.
Co-Authors Akhmad Sukri Gito Hadiprayitno Jono Irawan Nur Lestari