Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dia: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat
Ardiyan Saptawan
Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSTRUCTION OF SEMAMBU ISLAND VILLAGE, INDRALAYA UTARA DISTRICT, OGAN ILIR REGENCY Mardianto Mardianto; Retno Susilawati; Ardiyan Saptawan; Khairunnas Khairunnas; Rahmat Rafinzar
DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol 20 No 02 (2022): PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Publisher : Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Administrasi, FISIP, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dia.v20i02.7255

Abstract

The background of the research is to analyze the application of deliberative democracy in the implementation of the Village Development Planning deliberations in Pulau Semambu Village, North Indralaya District, Ogan Ilir Regency. The research method used is a qualitative research method with a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques were carried out through interviews, observations, and literature studies. The data were analyzed using an interactive model technique. The data analysis carried out was strengthened by using the NVivo 12 Plus supporting software. The selection of informants was done through the purposive sampling technique and the use of the source triangulation method to measure the validity of the data. The results of the study show that deliberative democracy has not been implemented optimally due to the lack of public understanding regarding development and the Musrenbangdes, so it has an impact on the low participation of the people involved. In addition, budget constraints and the lack of open dialogue are also other problems that become an evaluation of the implementation of the Musrenbangdes that have been implemented. so that the study of village problems and needs is not carried out in depth. Overall causes the principles of deliberative democracy have not been achieved optimally prioritizing community participation. To realize a deliberative village policy formulation process, the village government can take various approaches such as involving academics to assist the Musrenbangdes process. The government also needs to provide space for the widest possible community to be actively involved in the Musrenbangdes process through the availability of an open dialogue forum.
The Verstek Law Implementation In Religious Courts In South Sumatera Fidya Rahma Insani; Khalisah Hayatuddin; Ardiyan Saptawan; Muhamad Sadi Is
Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat Vol 23 No 1 (2023): Nurani
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v23i1.16030

Abstract

Verstek decisions are decisions that often occur in courts, especially in the Religious Courts, so the authors were interested in conducting them by using the formulation of the problem: how to apply verstek at Sekayu Religious Courts, South Sumatra. Then, what are the obstacles in implementing verstek at Sekayu Religious Court, South Sumatra. Empirical research was used as the method of research. Research result; the application of verstek at Sekayu Religious Court of South Sumatra has been carried out in accordance with applicable law. Meanwhile, the obstacles faced by the Sekayu Religious Court of South Sumatra in resolving the verstek case were; the number of divorce cases was quite high from year to year; the time required in handling takes a long time, from the beginning of registration until the decision was read out; the down-payment fee for the verstek case had been determined by the Religious Court based on the radius of residence of the applicant/plaintiff and the respondent/defendant, not adjusted to the financial capacity of the parties; and witness constraints, sometimes the parties present witnesses who had never seen or heard of the dispute, but indeed the husband and wife had been separated for a long time.
Co-Authors Fidya Rahma Insani Khairunnas Khairunnas Khalisah Hayatuddin Mardianto Mardianto Muhamad Sadi Is Rafinzar, Rahmat Retno Susilawati