Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KEDUDUKAN DAN PERAN PEMBIMBING KEMASYARAKATAN DALAM PENDAMPINGAN BAGI ANAK BERHADAPAN HUKUM SEBAGAI PELAKU Andrie Irawan; Muhammad Afied Hambali; Yulio Iqbal Cahyo Arsetyo
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 7 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v7i2.4119

Abstract

This research discusses the position and role of community counselors in assisting children in conflict with the law as perpetrators with limitations in their position and role in the juvenile criminal justice system. The research methodology used is juridical normative, where the research will focus on analyzing the relevant laws and regulations and their implementing regulations regarding the focus of the title of this research based on bibliographic sources. This study uses a normative juridical approach, it is to be analyzed using analytical descriptive method with a deductive research flow. The results of this study state that the position of community counselors in the juvenile criminal justice system is normatively regulated specifically in laws and regulations with regard to clear main tasks and functions, while empirically, community counselors can also be declared as law enforcers like the police, prosecutors, judges and advocates. With regard to the role of community advisors in the juvenile criminal justice system, it can be seen in their presence in state detention centers and courts which generally play a role in assisting and facilitating clients (children who are in conflict with the law as perpetrators) in dealing with various problems and cases faced by clients.
THE RIGHT TO HOT PURSUIT IN UNCLOS AND HOT PURSUIT ARRANGEMENTS IN INDONESIA Yulio Iqbal Cahyo Arsetyo; Supriyono Supriyono
Citra Justicia : Majalah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 24, No 2 (2023): Agustus 2023
Publisher : Universitas Asahan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36294/cj.v24i2.3393

Abstract

After UNCLOS 1982 was in force, Indonesia's position as Archipelago Nation is secure, but there is “compensation” that should be paid by Indonesia to the International community and it was Indonesia should provide Archipelagic Sea Lanes for international ships and Indonesia had to an allowed international ship crossing the Indonesia territorial water by “Peace Passage” concept in UNCLOS 1982, but there is a question about how if an unlawful ship crossing Indonesia Territorial water? Under UNCLOS 1982 the state can do Hot Pursuit to protect its territory but how does Indonesia apply that? The Problem Question regarding this paper will focus on Hot Pursuit Regulations in UNCLOS and Indonesian National Law and how are they applied? The methodology of this research uses literature review with the object of international treaty and uses data and information from internet network tracing which is then expert opinion. The result of the research shows that UNCLOS 1982 had specific rules regarding Hot Pursuit, especially in Article 111, which Hot Pursuit already become a Topic in UNCLOS I before, For Indonesia, the rule of Hot Pursuit already exist in Some of Indonesia's legislature and bill even Indonesia already had special Standart operational procedure regarding conducting Hot Pursuit in Indonesia territory. The right of the state to carry out Hot Pursuit or instant pursuit has existed since the era of the first UNCLOS discussion in Geneva and then resumed at UNCLOS 1982. Indonesia itself as one of the ratifying countries of UNCLOS 1982 has implemented the right of instant pursuit or hot pursuit in state regulations.
PELAKSANAAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI SRAGEN Azizah Mutiara Ningrum Azizah; Herwin Sulistyowati; Yulio Iqbal Cahyo Arsetyo
Justicia Journal Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): Justicia Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32492/jj.v12i2.12202

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana penganiayaan di Kejaksaan Negeri Sragen. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian empiris. Guna memperoleh data digunakan metode studi pustaka dan penelitian lapangan, meliputi wawancara dan observasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan analisis data dapat disimpulkan bahwa pelaksanaan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana penganiayaan di Kejaksaan Negeri Sragen dapat diuraikan sebagai berikut : Proses pelaksaan penghentian penuntutan dengan restorative justice oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Sragen berawal dari tahap penerimaan dan penelitian tersangka dan barang bukti (Tahap II). Setelah jaksa memutuskan bahwa perkara tersebut dapat diselesaikan penuntutannya berdasarkan restorative justice sesuai dengan syarat yang ada dalam Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif, kemudian dilaksanakan perdamaian. Tata cara perdamaian ada 3, yaitu: upaya perdamaian, proses perdamaian, pelaksanaan kesepakatan perdamaian. Dalam prosesnya jaksa penuntut umum berperan sebagai jaksa fasilitator. Setelah proses perdamaian tercapai atau berhasil kemudian jaksa membuat konsep surat permintaan penghentian penuntutan kepada Kepala Kejaksaan Tinggi, yang kemudian apabila telah disetujui oleh Jaksa Agung Muda Tindak Pidana Umum kemudian Kepala Kejaksaan Negeri mengeluarkan Surat Ketetapan Penghentian Penuntutan.