Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS)
Hery Kurniawan Zaenal
Universitas 45 Surabaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
HAKIKAT PERSETUJUAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PADA NOTARIS DALAM PROSES PERADILAN Hery Kurniawan Zaenal
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Juni : JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : POLITEKNIK PRATAMA PURWOKERTO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v1i2.867

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) analyze and discover the nature of the approval of the Notary Honorary Council as an effort to protect the law against notaries in the judicial process; (2) Analyze and find law enforcement for Notaries related to Professional Ethics. This type of research is normative law. While the research approach used, namely: Legislation, conceptual approach, and case approach, as well as a comparative approach. The legal materials used in this study are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. While the analysis of legal materials using qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that: (1) The regional MKN has the authority to examine applications submitted by investigators, public prosecutors or judges; as well as giving approval or rejection of requests for approval to take photocopies of minuta deed and summons Notaries to attend investigations, prosecutions, and judicial processes (66 paragraph (1) UUJNP), (2) Sanctions imposed on Notaries who violate the professional code of ethics are regulated in Article 85 UUJN, namely in the form of: Verbal warning; Written warning; temporary stop; Honorable discharge; and Dishonorable Dismissal by the Notary Honorary Council.
RATIO DECIDENDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 49/PUU-X/2012 TENTANG PEMBATALAN PASAL 66 AYAT (1) UUJN-2004 Hery Kurniawan Zaenal
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): September : JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : POLITEKNIK PRATAMA PURWOKERTO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v1i3.868

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) analyze and find the ratio of the decision of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/PUU-X/2012 concerning the annulment of Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN-2004, (2) the legal impact of the Constitutional Court's decision no. 49/PUU-X/2012 Against Legal Protection for Notaries. The type of research is normative law. While the research approach used, namely: Legislation, contextual approach, and case approach, as well as a comparative approach. The legal materials used in this study are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. While the analysis of legal materials using qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that: (1) The ratio decidendi of the cancellation of Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public is based, that the article is not in accordance with the principle of equality before the law (equality in law) for every citizen. There is the approval of the Notary Honorary Council, not in accordance with the sense of justice and the criminal law enforcement process, as well as the principle of an independent judicial power; (2) Legal Impact of MK Decision No. 49/Puu-X/2012 Regarding Legal Protection for Notaries, the notary loses his special rights, namely summoning a Notary in the case of interest in a criminal examination does not need to obtain permission from the Regional Supervisory Council as stipulated in the provisions of Article 66 of the JN Law, this is for guarantee legal certainty and responsibility for the deed issued.
Co-Authors