Ari A. Perdana, Ari A.
The Economics of Development Program, National Center for Development Studies, Australian National University, Canberra

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Populisme Kanan, Islam dan Konteks Indonesia Perdana, Ari A.
MAARIF Vol 14 No 1 (2019): Populisme Islam dan Tantangan Demokrasi Islam di Indonesia Pasca-Pilpres
Publisher : MAARIF Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (170.08 KB) | DOI: 10.47651/mrf.v14i1.47

Abstract

Kemenangan Donald Trump di Pilpres AS dan Brexit di Inggris menandai menguatnya sentimen populisme dalam politik elektotral. Sejumlah pemilu di Eropa setelah itu melanjutkan fenomena ini. Menguatnya populisme sebagian disebabkan oleh faktor kesenjangan ekonomi, tapi lebih banyak karena pertentangan kultural. Menguatnya dukungan pada kelompok Islam konservatif di Indonesia memiliki banyak karakteristik serupa dengan tren populisme global.
Behind China's Success Story: Comparing the Economic Development of China and India Perdana, Ari A.
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia Vol 1 No 2 (2001): Januari
Publisher : Department of Economics-FEB UI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (135.393 KB) | DOI: 10.21002/jepi.v1i2.615

Abstract

Comparing the economic development in China and India has been interesting. While one has experienced an impressive economic growth performance, the other seemed to take a slower path. One popular argument says that the answer lies on China's success on attracting foreign capital. This argument is supported by some stylized facts related to the explanation for a country's attractiveness for foreign capital.The main idea of this essay is that China's relative success over India is a result of its unique characteristics. The purpose of this essay is to deliver supporting arguments for such hypothesis by analyzing the stylized facts. The readers should note that the scope of this essay is the internal determinants of the relatively different speeds of reforms, rather than the policy analysis.The essay is presented in three parts. The first part reviews the identical conditions which both countries shared in the beginning. The second part shows the different success stories. The third part is the comparison of some unique conditions which influenced the different outcomes of development.Â