Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

VERSTEK DECISION IN DIVORCE CASE IN RELIGIOUS COURTS OF RANTAUPRAPAT Risdalina Risdalina; Kusno Kusno; Bernat Panjaitan; Maya Jannah
Journal of Social Research Vol. 1 No. 12 (2022): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v1i12.391

Abstract

Background: In a Civil Judgment, one of which is called a Verstek Judgment, there is a divorce case trial process, the Panel of Judges has the authority to decide cases in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Verstek is a judgment rendered by a judge in the absence of the Defendant at trial even though the Defendant has been duly summoned by the bailiff of the court. Therefore the judge can decide the case with a verstex verdict. The author took the research site at the Rantauprapat Religious Court. Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze verstek decisions in divorce cases in rantauprapat religious courts. Methods: The method used in this writing is the Empirical normative method, which is research based on the provisions of applicable laws and regulations by looking at the implementation conditions in the field. Results: The Rantauprapat Religious Court is domiciled in Labuhanbatu Induk Regency which is in charge of North Labuhanbatu Regency and South Labuhanbatu Regency, which has the duty and authority to receive, examine, adjudicate, decide and settle cases of marriage, inheritance, wills, grants, waqf, and alms as well as resolve disputes in the field of sharia economy among Muslims to uphold law and justice, as stipulated in Law Number 3 Year 2006 concerning amendments to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts. Conslusion: Verstek Decision Legal Remedies in Divorce Cases is by filing a challenge against the verstek decision within 14 (fourteen) days after the notification is received by the defendant.
Balance of monodualistic principles in different efforts at the level of investigation on child abuse of narcotics crime Bernat Panjaitan; Risdalina Risdalina; Kusno Kusno
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 9, No 4 (2023): JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Theraphy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/020232280

Abstract

Based on the setting for determining criminal policies that are in accordance with the values of people's lives, the setting for determining criminal policies is contained in the Criminal Code as general provisions and in the special criminal provisions of Law No. 35 of 2009 as a special crime that regulates narcotics. Based on this, the problem that will be discussed is how the monodualistic principle in eradicating criminal acts of narcotics abuse committed by children is contrary to the law related to Law No. 35 of 2009 and Law No. 11 of 2012. This research is normative juridical research, namely research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data. In terms of implementing the diversion, there are several things that make it impossible. There are several factors that cause the diversion of children who abuse narcotics to not be achieved,namely internal and external factors. @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
Balance of monodualistic principles in different efforts at the level of investigation on child abuse of narcotics crime Bernat Panjaitan; Risdalina Risdalina; Kusno Kusno
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 9, No 4 (2023): JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Theraphy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/020232280

Abstract

Based on the setting for determining criminal policies that are in accordance with the values of people's lives, the setting for determining criminal policies is contained in the Criminal Code as general provisions and in the special criminal provisions of Law No. 35 of 2009 as a special crime that regulates narcotics. Based on this, the problem that will be discussed is how the monodualistic principle in eradicating criminal acts of narcotics abuse committed by children is contrary to the law related to Law No. 35 of 2009 and Law No. 11 of 2012. This research is normative juridical research, namely research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data. In terms of implementing the diversion, there are several things that make it impossible. There are several factors that cause the diversion of children who abuse narcotics to not be achieved,namely internal and external factors. @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}