Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani)
Ryan Muthiara Wasti
universitas indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PRAKTIK DEMOKRASI MODERN DALAM PEMERINTAHAN NAGARI DI MINANGKABAU Fitra Arsil; Mohammad Novrizal; Ryan Muthiara Wasti; Yunani Abiyoso; Ali Abdillah
Arena Hukum Vol. 15 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01503.8

Abstract

The adat governance of Minangkabau has adopted the democratic principles long before the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has such principles. This was due to the character of Minangkabau society and its culture which are inherited from their ancestors in Minangkabau society. This paper examines how forms of democratic practice in Minangkabau are related to democratic theory and the division of power. This normative legal research is supported by conducting interviews with some prominent adat figures in the Minangkabau society. In conclusion, it shows that the democratic principles in Nagari can exist until now because of the influence of adat figures. The adat figures preserve and combine such principles with religious norms as their indigenous values to be the main reference to run the Nagari.
PROBLEMATIKA KEDUDUKAN GUBERNUR SEBAGAI WAKIL PEMERINTAH PUSAT DALAM PROGRAM STRATEGIS NASIONAL Sandya Erlangga; Ryan Muthiara Wasti
Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Vol 13, No 1 (2023): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/humani.v13i1.6326

Abstract

Kewajiban Gubernur dalam melaksanakan Program Strategis Nasional tidak selamanya optimal. Fakta bahwa masyarakat menolak pembangunan Bendungan Bener sebagai salah satu Program Strategis Nasional merupakan cerminan bahwa Gubernur hanya menjalankan kewajiban tanpa memperhatikan aspirasi masyarakat. Pasal 67 dan 68 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah terkait pemberian sanksi kepada kepala daerah yang tidak melaksanakan Program Strategis Nasional menimbulkan problematika pembentukan kebijakan Gubernur yang lebih mengutamakan kepentingan Pemerintah Pusat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan aspek yuridis normatif tepat dan tidaknya pemberian sanksi kepada Gubernur yang tidak melaksanakan Program Strategis Nasional.  Metode penelitian  dilakukan  dengan cara mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan  serta konsep yang berkaitan dengan kewenangan Gubernur di tingkat daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kewajiban Gubernur sebagai Wakil Pemerintah Pusat dalam melaksanakan Program Strategis Nasional Bendungan Bener menimbulkan prolematika karena tidak sepenuhnya berdampak positif pada kesejahteraan masyarakat dan menegasikan hak-hak masyarakat yang terdampak. Selain itu, mekanisme sanksi pemberhentian jabatan Gubernur yang menggunakan penilaian internal Pemerintah Pusat berpotensi menimbulkan kesewenang-wenangan jabatan Presiden sebagai kepala Pemerintahan.
Politik Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pasca Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Nadia Ayu Febriani; Ryan Muthiara Wasti
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6483

Abstract

Article 22A of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia mandates the establishment of a rule regarding the law-making process, which serves as a guideline for the law-making process from its inception until the regulation is enacted to the public. However, in its implementation, problems are still related to the law-making process in Indonesia. This normative research uses a statutory and conceptual approach that specifically looks at "over regulated" or "legal obesity” to analyze the legal politics of the formation of laws and regulations after the second amendment of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Laws and Regulations. In this context, there is an overlap between one law and another, which creates sectoral egos and results in legal uncertainty in its application. One of the causes of this legal obesity is the lack of regularity in the law-making process. In this case, legislators do not always refer to the guidelines for the law-making process and the principles for forming statutory regulations as stipulated in the law-making process regulation. In addition, the law still needs to be optimal in fulfilling meaningful participation. Therefore, the author will analyze the politics of law of the amendments of law-making process regulation after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which includes accommodating the omnibus method and the concept of meaningful community participation as a solution for overlapping legislation in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ali Abdillah Fitra Arsil Mohammad Novrizal Nadia Ayu Febriani Sandya Erlangga Yunani Abiyoso