Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The presumption of innocence: Interpretation and application in online journalism Dicky Wahyudi; Anang Sujoko; Zainal Amin Ayub
Informasi Vol 52, No 2 (2022): Informasi
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/informasi.v52i2.54387

Abstract

Implementation of the Presumption of Innocence by journalists has implications for the occurrence of trial by the press and potentially impacts social disharmony. This study aims to explain the interpretation of the presumption of innocence in journalism, and the understanding and application of the presumption of innocence by online media journalists. This research uses qualitative methods by utilizing two data collection techniques. Firstly, documentation that collects some related research about the Journalistic Codes of Ethics of the Press Council, PWI and AJI. Secondly, in-depth interviews with four online media journalists. The result shows that the literal interpretation of the presumption of innocence is a principle not to judge someone even though it is side by side with the principle of objectivity, covering both sides, mention of identity, and legal grammar. Online media journalists have a collective understanding of the presumption of innocence. However, the journalists have an authentic understanding that causes the different implementation of the presumption of innocence. Moreover, demands for faster news production, media agency policies, and personal interest from journalists also impact partial implementation. This research contributes by forming a model for applying the presumption of innocence for online media journalists to avoid trial by the press.
POLEMIC ON THE DISSOLUTION OF MINISTRIES: AN OVERVIEW OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA Muhammad Mutawalli; Zainal Amin Ayub; Emmanuel Ibiam Amah
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol. 24 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the strengthening of the President's authority and identify polemics that have arisen related to the dissolution of ministries based on a review of Law Number 39, 2008. This study used a normative qualitative approach. The research was conducted at ministry and official agencies, as well as several activists at state studies institutions in the provinces of South-Sulawesi and West-Sulawesi. This research applies legal material collection techniques through documentation or literature studies and interview techniques. The results of the analysis show that in the process of forming a cabinet, good cooperation between the two institutions is needed to reach agreement and consensus. Intense communication and dialogue between the president as the head of the executive and parliament as the legislature helped to reach a consensus on the composition of the cabinet which was considered effective and capable of obtaining sufficient political support. The polemic that occurred was due to the lack of transparency in public participation, as well as collaboration between government agencies in the preparation and ratification of laws and regulations. Keywords: Government Cabinet, Presidential System, Constitutional Court.