Dwiatmoko, Anang
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Problematika Pengisian Jabatan Menteri Yang Membidangi Birokrasi di Indonesia Sorik, Sultan; Natalia, Siska Windu; Yustiyah, Erma; Dwiatmoko, Anang
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the problems of filling ministerial positions in charge of the bureaucracy in Indonesia. The form of research used is normative juridical. From the research conducted, it was found that, 1) in the midst of the spirit of the State Civil Apparatus Law to implement the Merit System in human resource management, one of the important things that was forgotten was about filling in the ministerial positions in charge of bureaucracy, which is the spearhead of bureaucratic policy makers in Indonesia. Indonesia; 2) pressure from political parties was very influential in selecting ministers in the cabinet during the period of President Jokowi's administration, so it is not surprising that ministers in charge of bureaucracy are often from political parties; 3) filling the position of minister in charge of the bureaucracy in Indonesia contradicts the theory put forward by Max Weber. If the assistant to the president (minister) still comes from a political party, there will be problems of loyalty, a minister will find it difficult to get out of the double loyalty trap, between serving the president or the head of a political party. So that in the future filling ministerial positions, especially those in charge of bureaucracy, indicators need to be made, so that the minister can help carry out his duties in the implementation of a better state government and not be trapped in double service between the president and the chairman of political parties.
PERDEBATAN TEORITIS TERHADAP PERLUASAN RUANG LINGKUP KEUANGAN NEGARA DI INDONESIA Sorik, Sutan; Dwiatmoko, Anang
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 52, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The focus of this research is the expansion of the scope of state finance which currently still presents cross-thinking. The existence of a coherent understanding regarding the application of the financial legal status of a legal entity, whether it is related to state finances, regional finances, state-owned enterprises (BUMN) finances, regional-owned enterprises (BUMD) finances, or private finances is the background why this happens. In the development of the expansion of the scope of state finances, it became even stronger when the Constitutional Court also issued several decisions in response to requests for judicial review, starting from the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 77/PUU-IX/2011, Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 48/PUU-IX/2013, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 62/PUU-IX/2013. The elasticity of state finances with the concept through a narrow area and also a broad spectrum for the status of state finances will depend on how the parties interpret and use the meaning of state finances themselves. The opening of a broad interpretation of state finances is not only a matter of audit authority but also a problem that is increasingly widespread. The type of research used is normative juridical research. The research method is qualitative. The results of the study found that there was no unified opinion regarding state finances, whether based on theory, laws and regulations, or the decision of the Constitutional Court.