Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal BIOEDUSCIENCE
Anitia Fadhila Bumay
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:19:"Universitas Lampung";}
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik pada Jenjang SMA dengan Tingkat Akreditasi yang Berbeda di Lampung Utara Anitia Fadhila Bumay; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 6 No 3 (2022): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.81 KB) | DOI: 10.22236/jbes/639047

Abstract

Background: Argumentation skill is a crucial ability to be possessed by students. Argumentation skills can be trained by applying a scientific approach during learning. The implementation of the scientific approach in schools can vary; it is suspected that one of the causes is the accreditation rating. The study aimed to determine the differences in the argumentation skill of high school students based on their accreditation rating. Methods: The research design used is the Ex-post Facto design. The sample in this study was sampled using the purposive sampling technique. Results:  There are differences in students' argumentation abilities between accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. Conclusions: Students' argumentation skill differs between high school students with accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. The difference in students' argumentation skills is caused by differences in the application of the scientific approach applied by teachers in each school.
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik pada Jenjang SMA dengan Tingkat Akreditasi yang Berbeda di Lampung Utara Anitia Fadhila Bumay; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 6 No 3 (2022): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22236/jbes/639047

Abstract

Background: Argumentation skill is a crucial ability to be possessed by students. Argumentation skills can be trained by applying a scientific approach during learning. The implementation of the scientific approach in schools can vary; it is suspected that one of the causes is the accreditation rating. The study aimed to determine the differences in the argumentation skill of high school students based on their accreditation rating. Methods: The research design used is the Ex-post Facto design. The sample in this study was sampled using the purposive sampling technique. Results:  There are differences in students' argumentation abilities between accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. Conclusions: Students' argumentation skill differs between high school students with accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. The difference in students' argumentation skills is caused by differences in the application of the scientific approach applied by teachers in each school.
Co-Authors Dina Maulina Neni Hasnunidah