Irwan Nopian Sinaga
STIE IBMI Medan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION STRATEGY ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE Deri Prayudi; Irwan Nopian Sinaga; Taufik Risal
Jurnal Ekonomi Vol. 12 No. 01 (2023): Jurnal Ekonomi, 2023 Periode Januari - Maret
Publisher : SEAN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

PT. Abul Abul Bandung is a company engaged in the manufacture of shoes. Problems at PT. Abul Abul Bandung, namely not achieving the production target set by the company. This is allegedly due to machine damage during production activities and the lack of awareness and sense of responsibility of employees for the company's goals. The purpose of this study was to find out how much influence the internal environment has on company performance and find out how much influence innovation strategy has on company performance in PT. Abul Abul Bandung. The objects in this study are the internal environment (X1), innovation strategy (X2) and company performance (Y). The method used in this research is a quantitative method with a descriptive and associative approach. The sampling technique in this study used a saturated sampling (census). The samples taken in this study were 35 people, namely the leadership of PT. Abul Abul Bandung consisting of managers and supervisors. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis, including the coefficient of determination test, multiple correlation coefficient, simultaneous test (F test) and partial test (T test). Based on the results of the study, it was found that there was a positive and significant influence of internal environmental variables on company performance of 0.751, and a positive and significant influence of innovation strategy variables on company performance variables of 0.956, as well as a positive and significant influence of internal environment and innovation strategies in improving performance company of 0.984 or 96.8% while the remaining 0.32 or 3.2% is influenced by other factors outside of this study. From these results it is known that there is a positive and significant influence of internal environment variables and innovation strategy variables in improving company performance.
The Influence of Motivation, Work Environment and Compensation on Employee Performance: Case Study at PT. Marurat Artaraya Irwan Nopian Sinaga
Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship (e-Journal) Vol 17 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) STIE Pasundan Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55208/jebe.v17i2.447

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of motivation, work environment, and compensation on employee performance at PT. Marurat Artaraya. The population in this study are employees of PT. Marurat Artaraya, totaling 145 people. While the technique of determining the sample using the solvin technique. This type of research is a quantitative research. The data sources in this study are primary data and secondary data where the data has been processed from the internet, documentation, and journals. While the data analysis technique used is descriptive and multiple linear regression with hypothesis testing by t test, f test and coefficient of determination. The results of multiple linear regression analysis that show Y = 2.467 + - 0.115X1 + 0.585X2 + 0.436 e. While the results of the test (t) or partial test show that motivation has a negative and insignificant effect on employee performance at PT. Marurat Artaraya, where it can be seen that the motivation value tcount is -1.797 > ttable 0.2201, the work environment has a positive and significant effect, it can be seen tcount is 6.043 > ttable 0.2201, while compensation has a positive and significant effect, it can be seen tcount is 3.774 > ttable 0.2201 on the performance of employees at PT. Marurat Artaraya. Then the results of the f test showed that simultaneously there was a positive and significant effect of motivational variables (X1), work environment (X2), and compensation (X3) on employee performance (Y) and the Fcount value was 156.871 > Ftable 3.16. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (R2) in the adjusted R Square value is 0.890 (89.0%). So it can be said that 89.0% of the variation of the independent variables, namely motivation, work environment and compensation in this model has a contribution to the variable performance of employees at PT. Marurat Artaraya. While the remaining 11.0% is influenced by other variables outside the model.