p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Academia Open
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Infaq and Shadaqah for Education: Prohibited Fees or Social Responsibility? Suryani Indah; Rifqi Ridlo Phalevy
Academia Open Vol 8 No 1 (2023): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.8.2023.4994

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the relationship between voluntary donations (infaq) and prohibited fees in the Ministry of Education and Culture Regulation No. 44 of 2012, as well as the views of Islamic scholars regarding the position of voluntary donations as a means of financing education. The research method used is a normative approach that utilizes legal and comparative approaches. The research findings indicate that voluntary donations, also known as infaq, shadaqah, or amal jariyah, are considered a prohibited fee under the Ministry of Education and Culture Regulation No. 44 of 2012. However, in practice, these voluntary donations meet the criteria for fees as described in Article 11 of the regulation and are viewed by Islamic scholars as a form of social responsibility in the field of education. It is not permissible for these donations to be binding on the donor in terms of the amount and time of donation. Highlights : This research examines the connection between voluntary donations (infaq) and prohibited fees in education financing under Ministry of Education and Culture Regulation No. 44 of 2012. The findings show that although infaq is considered a prohibited fee, it is viewed as a form of social responsibility in education by Islamic scholars. It should not be binding on the donor in terms of the amount and time of donation. Keywords: infaq, shadaqah, voluntary donations, education financing, Islamic scholars.
Mural Removals During COVID-19 Pandemic: Violation of Freedom of Expression? Aulia Paramita; Rifqi Ridlo Phalevy
Academia Open Vol 8 No 1 (2023): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.8.2023.5018

Abstract

This COVID-19 pandemic has caused a decline in the community's economy, leading the government to issue policies that are deemed unsatisfactory by the people. As a result, it has spurred artists to create murals containing criticism of the government. However, the public perceives the government to be against criticism because they have removed murals, which is deemed to have violated local regulations and forgotten that everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Pasuruan City Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2017 Article 19 Letter a and assess the compatibility of the regulation with Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. The research method used is socio-legal method, and the results of this study indicate that the removal of murals was not based on human rights. Therefore, this study concludes that there should be a special treatment for murals with critical content. Highlights : COVID-19 pandemic has led to a decline in the community's economy, which has resulted in the government issuing unsatisfactory policies. Murals have been created by artists to criticize the government, but the removal of these murals by the government has sparked public outrage. The study found that the removal of murals violated human rights, and therefore, there should be a special treatment for murals with critical content. Keywords: Mural removals, COVID-19 pandemic, Freedom of expression, Government policies, Human rights.