Ismu Gunadi
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara, Jl. Ahmad Yani 114, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, 60231

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM YANG TIMBUL BERKAITAN DENGAN WEWENANG DISKRESI OLEH PENYIDIK UNTUK MEMILIH DAN MENENTUKAN “KETERANGAN AHLI” PORNOGRAFI Ismu Gunadi
Perspektif Vol 11, No 3 (2006): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (203.411 KB) | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v11i3.277

Abstract

Authority of Diskresi by investigator in chosening and detemerning expert eyewitness or expert do not be supported clear legal fundament in practice the straightening of law role of investigator subyektif in environmental context [of] family embraced religion and also view having the character of person of especial factor; which is on its its have an effect on to justice decision which frequently exactly disagree with expectation justice of society that is light crime decision that is attempt crime.
Kajian Terhadap Wewenang Diskresi Penyidik Untuk Memilih Dan Menentukan Ahli Pornografi Ismu Gunadi Widodo
Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan Vol. 1 Issue. 1 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (195.707 KB)

Abstract

Based on discretion authority to legality of an act which has been done, investigator must base on rule of code or law The meaning of discretion authority is input of legality to act as a Indonesian Police (POLRI) as investigator to carry on investigating duty, for instance accident case in the traffic. Pro Justice take the main role in investigating, arresting, in prison, researching conviscate and others investigate based on discrete authority.