Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra
Suharyo Suharyo
Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kesalahan Berbahasa Mahasiswa Undip Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Fakultas Peternakan dan Pertanian Suharyo Suharyo
Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 15, No 1: Februari 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (436.97 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/nusa.15.1.45-52

Abstract

This research aims to reveal language skills among students. To answer the research question, it was conducted using a questionnaire technique. The questionnaire (which contained 11 questions) was distributed to 40 FPP students, Diponegoro University, Semarang via online (ms team). Data were analyzed using PUEBI and Indonesian language standard grammar. The result, (1) the average respondent answered correctly at 54.54%; (2) respondents who answered correctly about number 1 by 87.50%; (3) for question number 2 as much as 0% (4) for question number 3, respondents who answered correctly were 2.5%; (5) for question number 4, amounting to 67.59%; (6) for problem number 5, amounting to 85%; (7) for question number 6, amounting to 62.50%, (8) for question number 7, amounting to 97.50%, (9) for question number 8, amounting to 6%, (10) for question number 9, amounting to 67 , 50%; (11) for question number 10 only 40%, and (12) for problem number 11 all respondents answered incorrectly.Keywords: Mistakes; language; Undip students.IntisariPenelitin ini bertujuan mengungkap kemampuan berbahasa di kalangan mahasiswa. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian tersebut dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik angket. Angket (yang berisi 11 pertanyaan) dibagikan kepada 40 mahsiswa FPP, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang melalui daring (ms team). Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan PUEBI dan tata basa baku bahasa Indonesia. Hasilnya, (1) rata-rata responden menjawab benar sebesar 54,54%; (2) responden yang menjawab benar soal nomor 1 sebesar 87,50%; (3) untuk soal nomor 2 sebanyak 0% (4) untuk soal nomor3, responden yang menjawab benar sebesar 2,5%; (5) untuk soal nomor 4, sebesar 67,59%, (6) untuk soal nomor 5, sebesar 85%; (7) untuk soal nomor 6, sebesar 62,50%, (8) untuk soal nomor 7, sebesar 97,50%, (9) untuk soal nomor 8, sebesar 6%, (10) untuk soal nomor 9, sebesar 67,50%; (11) untuk soal nomor 10 hanya 40%, dan (12) untuk soal nomor 11 semua responden jawabannya salah.Kata kunci: Kesalahan; berbahasa; mahasiswa Undip
Paradigma Kritis Dalam Penelitian Wacana Suharyo Suharyo
Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 13, No 3: Agustus 2018
Publisher : Program Studi Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (360.344 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/nusa.13.3.482-492

Abstract

So far, linguistic research, especially discourse research, is still focused on aspects of the linguistic structure as forming the discourse. Discourse is examined for the existence of cohesiveness and coherence of the discourse. What are the linguistic units that form cohesiveness and cohesiveness both lexical and grammatical coherence. This is different from discourse research using critical discourse paradigms. Critical discourse holds that discourse-forming structures are not in a social "vacuum". Because, discourse is basically a (social) action that is loaded with political, economic, power, cultural background etc. To conduct discourse research using critical paradigms, it is necessary to know the research characteristics of critical discourse analiysis, which includes (1) discourse is (social) action, (2) context, (3) historical, (4) power, (5) ideology, and ( 6) (diction) vocabulary basically (a) limits classification, (b) limits the views of a person / group, and (c) marginalizes certain people / groups. Among the available models, the critical discourse analysis model of the van Dijk model is a well-known model in Indonesia.
Penelitian Bahasa dengan Analisis Framing Suharyo Suharyo
Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 13, No 4: November 2018
Publisher : Program Studi Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (456.464 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/nusa.13.4.676-686

Abstract

This paper offers a framing analysis approach as one of the alternatives that can be tried to reveal linguistic symptoms, especially discourse in the mass media. Framing analysis does not only see language in terms of its structure, but also from other dimensions.To be able to apply the framing analysis in the discourse study, knowledge and understanding of the theory and essential factors of framing analysis is needed. the function of mass media and the theory of hegemony. In addition, also need to know the characteristics of framing analysis, such as (1) facts, reality is actually the result of social construction, (2) mass media is a social construction agent in defining reality, (3) news is not a reflection of reality (language relativeity) , (4) news is not an objective fact, (5) journalists are actually not news reporters, but construction agents who have alignments, and (6) readers have their own interpretations of the news presented. The aspects that need to be considered are the schmatic, script, thematic, and rhetorical aspects and writing strategies.
Co-Authors