<![CDATA[The purpose of this study to determine the perceptions of law enforcement against remissions for corruption convicts, and to investigate how the efforts of Class I Semarang Prison in effecting remission. In writing this paper, the problem is: (1) How do perceptions of law enforcement in granting remissions for corruption convicts? (2) efforts - efforts that are being undertaken by Corrections Corporation of Class I Semarang in effecting remissions? This research uses a sociological approach to the study of law juridical associated legal aspects and regulations - laws and regulations are then linked to the fact that occur in the community. The results of research on the perception of law enforcement to remissions for corruption convicts that law enforcement has a different perception - different, law enforcement agree on tightening requirements remissions for corruption convicts on the grounds of corruption, including in particular criminal group. Regarding Penitentiary efforts in effecting remission for prisoners, granting remissions for corruption convicts have a direct impact to the behavior and attitudes. These impacts include inmates become a better person and have a passion to get back into society. Conclusions from this research is the perception of law enforcement is different - different regarding remissions for corruption convicts. Prosecutors and judges agree on remissions for corruption convicts while police disagree. Law enforcement agencies agree on tightening remissions for corruption convicts. Efforts are made of Class I Semarang Prison in an effort to streamline the provision of remission for prisoners have a positive impact on inmates during their formation in Class I Semarang Prison]]>
