Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Langit Biru: Jurnal Ilmiah Aviasi Nusantara Education
Hadi Winata
Universitas Bengkulu
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Engineering Environmental Science Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Training Instructor Course (TIC) Di Pusat Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Perhubungan Udara I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Oka; Syukri Hamzah; Hadi Winata; I M. Bayu Astika
Langit Biru: Jurnal Ilmiah Aviasi Vol 16 No 01 (2023): Langit Biru: Jurnal Ilmiah Aviasi
Publisher : Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia Curug

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54147/langitbiru.v16i01.637

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Training Instructor Course (TIC) at the Centre of Human Resources Development on Civil Aviation (CHRDCA) using the Kirkpatrick model. TIC training was developed and standardized by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). ICAO has developed level 1, 2 and 3 evaluations for TIC training, but has not yet developed level 4 evaluations. CHRDCA can access evaluation levels 1 and 2 from the Trainair Plus Electronic Management System (TPEMS). The evaluation results at level 1 were very good with an average score of 4.73. The results of the level 2 evaluation showed that all participants passed with an average score of 87.1. Level 3 evaluation results are managed directly by ICAO so CHRDCA cannot access them. However, the researchers conducted a survey with the results showing that there was an increase in the quality of behaviours in managing learning. Based on the results of the evaluation at level 3, it can be concluded that at evaluation level 4 there will be an increase in student learning results as a result of an increase in the instructor's pedagogical competence.
Students’ Perception Of Application In Writing Of Peer-Assessment: Before And After Revision Fera Zasrianita; Syukri Hamza; Hadi Winata
Nusantara Education Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Nusantara Education
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Peer-assessment has attracted more attention an effective assessment tool in recent years. Peer-assessment refers to the arrangement for peers to consider the quality of learning outcomes of others of similar status; it received attention of various studies due to the growing interest in the student-centered approach as learners need to be involved in the learning process even in the assessment. This research was purposed at elaborating students’ perception of application in writing of peer assessment either before or after revision. Writing skills are the skills you use to write effectively and succinctly. A good writer is someone who can communicate their point to their audience without using too much fluff and in a way that the other person can understand. Writing skills don't just include the physical act. If used effectively, peer assessment – a formative assessment strategy that encourages students to comment on the work of their peers – can improve students’ understanding of success criteria, help them to become more engaged in learning and develop their interpersonal skills, as well as potentially even reducing teacher workload. Conversely, however, peer assessment can hinder students’ learning if poor-quality, insensitive or unhelpful peer feedback is exchanged, and may strain relationships between learners. The subject of this research was students in third semester of the English Department of Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Tadris Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu. The total number was 32 students. The research design used was qualitative research which measured students’ perceptions of the implementation of peer assessment in writing: before and after revision. The result showed that before revision, students had negative perception toward their own writing. After revision, they had positive perceptions toward peer assessment strategy. Those included usefulness and meaningfulness, nature of feedback, reality of feedback, precision, validity, fairness, and personal goal-setting. Besides that, the score after revision (7.9) was higher than the score before revision (6.62). It meant that the result showed the increasing of students’ score after revision.
Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Training Instructor Course (TIC) Di Pusat Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Perhubungan Udara I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Oka; Syukri Hamzah; Hadi Winata; I M. Bayu Astika
Langit Biru: Jurnal Ilmiah Aviasi Vol 16 No 02 (2023): Langit Biru: Jurnal Ilmiah Aviasi
Publisher : Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia Curug

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54147/langitbiru.v16i01.637

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Training Instructor Course (TIC) at the Centre of Human Resources Development on Civil Aviation (CHRDCA) using the Kirkpatrick model. TIC training was developed and standardized by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). ICAO has developed level 1, 2 and 3 evaluations for TIC training, but has not yet developed level 4 evaluations. CHRDCA can access evaluation levels 1 and 2 from the Trainair Plus Electronic Management System (TPEMS). The evaluation results at level 1 were very good with an average score of 4.73. The results of the level 2 evaluation showed that all participants passed with an average score of 87.1. Level 3 evaluation results are managed directly by ICAO so CHRDCA cannot access them. However, the researchers conducted a survey with the results showing that there was an increase in the quality of behaviours in managing learning. Based on the results of the evaluation at level 3, it can be concluded that at evaluation level 4 there will be an increase in student learning results as a result of an increase in the instructor's pedagogical competence.
Co-Authors Fera Zasrianita I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Oka I M. Bayu Astika Syukri Hamza Syukri Hamzah