Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lingua Cultura English Education Journal Jurnal KATA : Penelitian tentang Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra
Adip Arifin, Adip
STKIP PGRI PONOROGO, EAST JAVA
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
MISTAKES WITHIN THE DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS PRODUCED BY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS Arifin, Adip; -, Retmono; -, Warsono
English Education Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2014)
Publisher : English Education Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Learning a target language is actually a process of trial and error, whether as the first, the second or even foreign language. This study is aimed to find out the mistakes within the descriptive texts. The method used in this study was a qualitative approach, and the design was discourse analysis. The data were taken from the 27 descriptive texts written by the fourth semester students of English Department, while the technique of analysis was based on the error analysis theory, involved: collection of a sample, identification, description and explanation. The generic structure result showed that the students could write well in the identification and aspect part, but not in conclusion part. In case of lexicogrammatical features, the use of verbs caused the most number of mistakes, or 132 mistakes (30.07%), while the fewest ones was the use of adjective, found only 4 times (0.91%) of the total mistakes. Generally, the students used the lexicogrammatical features in their writing, even though still need to be improved. The causes of students’ mistakes were mostly due to the interlingual aspect.
How Non-Native Writers Realize Their Interpersonal Meaning? Arifin, Adip
Lingua Cultura Vol 12, No 2 (2018): Lingua Cultura Vol. 12 No. 2
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/lc.v12i2.3729

Abstract

This research was aimed at describing and explaining the interpersonal meaning, types of mood system, and modality found in the thesis abstracts. The method used was descriptive qualitative and specifically designed as discourse analysis. The data were taken from two abstracts, written by undergraduate students, majoring in English Language Education atdifferent colleges in Ponorogo, East Java. They were non-native of English. Units of analysis were clauses, words, and phrases. The data were analyzed by using interpersonal meaning theory, proposed by Halliday. The result of this research reveals that firstly, the interpersonal meaning of the abstracts is realized through wordings of the clauses based on the mood system (subject and finite), while the residue is realized through the element of predicator, complement, and adjunct. Secondly, the mood types found are mostly declarative, and only a few of them are interrogative. The declarative form is characterized by order of subject followed by finite, while the interrogative form is characterized by the use of question word, instead of the order of finite and subject. Thirdly, in terms of modality, the abstracts dominantly display the use of low degree modality (can, could, may) which signals the writer’s intention to weaken the authority toward the readers.
KESALAHAN LEKSIKOGRAMATIKAL PADA TEKS RECOUNT Arifin, Adip; Rois, Syamsudin
Jurnal KATA Vol 1, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Kata : Penelitian tentang Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra
Publisher : Lembaga Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi (LLDIKTI) Wilayah X

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (323.551 KB) | DOI: 10.22216/jk.v1i2.2130

Abstract

Language learning is basically a process of trial and error. It means that in every language learning activity, both in oral and written, errors in language are made. It also happens to Indonesian learners of English. This study is aimed at investigating the organization of lexicogrammatical feature in recount texts, written by sixth semester students of English Language Education Department, STKIP PGRI Ponorogo, in the academic year 215/2016. The study used descriptive qualitative method and designed as error analysis. The data were collected through written test composition. The result of study showed that the organization of lexicogrammatical feature was less satisfying. It could be seen from a number of mistakes produced by the students. In detail, there were 32 mistakes in using wrong word (misuse), 30 mistakes of wrong tense, 25 mistakes in using action verb, 21 mistakes in using finite, 17 mistakes in adverbial use, 17 mistakes of misspelling, 3 mistakes of using conjunction, 2 mistakes of using srticle, and 2 mistakes of using adjective. Pembelajaran bahasa pada prinsipnya merupakan proses mencoba dan gagal. Hal ini berarti bahwa dalam proses pembelajaran bahasa, baik lisan maupun tulisan, tidak terlepas dari berbagai kesalahan berbahasa. Bagi pembelajar Bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing di Indonesia tentu juga tidak bisa terlepas dari kesalahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana unsur-unsur pembentuk teks dalam teks recount yang ditulis oleh partisipan, yang berasal dari mahasiswa semester VI program studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris STKIP PGRI Ponorogo pada semester genap tahun akademik 2015/2016. Fokus penelitian ini adalah pengorganisasian fitur leksikogramatikal. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain error analysis. Data diperoleh dari written test composition, dan kemudian dianalisis berdasarkan prosedur error analysis. Dari hasil analisis data diketahui bahwa; pertama,  pengorganisasian teks khususnya pada fitur leksikogramatikal belum sepenuhnya memuaskan. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari statistik kesalahan yang telah teridentifikasi. Secara detail ditemukan kesalahan terbanyak pada penggunaan kata (misuse) yakni 32 kesalahan(22%), wrong tenses 30 kesalahan (20%), wrong action verb 25 kesalahan (17%), absence of finite 21 kesalahan (14%), adverbial mistake 17 kesalahan (11%), misspelling 17 kesalahan (9%), cnjunctionmistake 3 kesalahan (2%), articlemistake 2 kesalahan (1%), dan wrong adjective 2 kesalahan (1%). 
Co-Authors Retmono - Syamsudin Rois, Syamsudin Warsono -, Warsono