Supanji Supanji
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Surgical Technique of Late Spontaneous IOL-Capsular Bag Complex Dislocation with Low Corneal Endothelial Cell Density: A Case Report Firman Setya Wardhana; Dhimas Hari Sakti; Supanji Supanji; Muhammad Bayu Sasongko; Tri Wahyu Widayanti; Angela Nurini Agni
International Journal of Retina Vol 2 No 1 (2019): International Journal of Retina (IJRetina) - INAVRS
Publisher : Indonesian Vitreoretinal Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35479/ijretina.2019.vol002.iss001.54

Abstract

Introduction: IOL-capsular bag complex dislocation is a rare but serious complication of phacoemulsification surgery. Technique to repair this complication should be based on various clinical parameters including quality of corneal endothelial cells and the type of dislocated IOL. Case Presentation: We present a case of a 67-year-old male with left eye spontaneous one-piece foldable IOL-capsular bag complex dislocation to vitreous cavity 4 years after phacoemulsification surgery. Visual acuity of the left eye was 1/60, pupil was round with 3 mm diameter and IOP was 15 mmHg. Noncontact specular microscopy examination showed that the corneal endothelial cell density was 1100 cells/mm2. It was managed with 23-gauge posterior vitrectomy, IOL evacuation to anterior chamber, releasing the capsular bag and repositioning the IOL into posterior chamber by sutured scleral fixation. Result: Follow-up at 6thmonth, best corrected visual acuity of the left eye achieved 6/6, IOL at central position and the last corneal endothelial cell density was 1076 cells/mm2. Conclusions: Late spontaneous IOL-capsular bag complex dislocation with low corneal endothelial cell density can be safely managed with proper surgical technique. Vitrectomy and sutured scleral fixation of the previously dislocated IOL were effective in managing such case. Longer follow-up should be done to assure the stability of IOL position and the quality of corneal endothelial cells.
CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS REDUCTION AFTER INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF BEVACIZUMAB COMPARED TO INTRAVITREAL KETOROLAC IN NAIVE DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA Supanji Supanji; Angela Nurini Agni
International Journal of Retina Vol 5 No 2 (2022): International Journal of Retina (IJRetina) - INAVRS
Publisher : Indonesian Vitreoretinal Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35479/ijretina.2022.vol005.iss002.203

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a debilitating complication of the diabetic eye. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) was found to be responsible for this disease entity, and anti-VEGF remains the main treatment of DME. Inflammatory processes occur in diabetic eye, with some researchers postulates the role of them in the making of DME. This study’s objective is to search for anti-VEGF alternative using Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAID), ketorolac tromethamine. Methods: We conducted a double blind, randomized clinical trial in DME patients using intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and ketorolac. Central macular thickness (CMT) was assessed pre-treatment and one-month post-treatment. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Intraocular Pressure (IOP) were also assessed. Wilcoxon tests were performed to evaluate changes in CMT, visual acuity, and IOP. Result: We enrolled 50 treatment-naïve DME patients from March 2020 to March 2021. Twenty-five patients were allocated for each group. There is a statistically significant difference in CMT at one-month follow-up between the two groups (p:0.001) and a markedly reduced CMT between the groups (p:0.001), with the reduction higher in bevacizumab group. BCVA changes significantly in bevacizumab group (p:0.01), but there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p:0.07). There’s a marked difference of IOP in 1 hour after injection in both groups, with higher transient IOP elevation in ketorolac group (p:0.02), but there is no marked difference in one-month follow-up (p:>0.05). The perceived pain right after intravitreal injection is not different between bevacizumab and ketorolac group. Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of ketorolac found to be inferior compared to bevacizumab in reducing CMT of DME. Meanwhile, there’s no differences in visual acuity, intraocular pressure (one-month follow-up) and pain after injection between two groups.