Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOIN (Jurnal Online Informatika)
Erika Ramadhani
Informatics Department of Post Graduate Program, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta
Computer Science & IT

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Comparison of Audio Analysis Using Audio Forensic Technique and Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient Method (MFCC) as the Requirement of Digital Evidence Helmy Dzulfikar; Sisdarmanto Adinandra; Erika Ramadhani
JOIN (Jurnal Online Informatika) Vol 6 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Department of Informatics, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/join.v6i2.702

Abstract

Audio forensics is the application of science and scientific methods in handling digital evidence in the form of audio. In this regard, the audio supports the disclosure of various criminal cases and reveals the necessary information needed in the trial process. So far, research related to audio forensics is more on human voices that are recorded directly, either by using a voice recorder or voice recordings on smartphones, which are available on Google Play services or iOS Store. This study compares the analysis of live voices (human voices) with artificial voices on Google Voice and other artificial voices. This study implements the audio forensic analysis, which involves pitch, formant, and spectrogram as the parameters. Besides, it also analyses the data by using feature extraction using the Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) method, the Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) method, and applying the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm. The previously made live voice recording and artificial voice are then cut into words. Then, it tests the chunk from the voice recording. The testing of audio forensic techniques with the Praat application obtained similar words between live and artificial voices and provided 40,74% accuracy of information. While the testing by using the MFCC, DTW, KNN methods with the built systems by using Matlab, obtained similar word information between live voice and artificial voice with an accuracy of 33.33%.
The Comparison of Audio Analysis Using Audio Forensic Technique and Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient Method (MFCC) as the Requirement of Digital Evidence Helmy Dzulfikar; Sisdarmanto Adinandra; Erika Ramadhani
JOIN (Jurnal Online Informatika) Vol 6 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Department of Informatics, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/join.v6i2.702

Abstract

Audio forensics is the application of science and scientific methods in handling digital evidence in the form of audio. In this regard, the audio supports the disclosure of various criminal cases and reveals the necessary information needed in the trial process. So far, research related to audio forensics is more on human voices that are recorded directly, either by using a voice recorder or voice recordings on smartphones, which are available on Google Play services or iOS Store. This study compares the analysis of live voices (human voices) with artificial voices on Google Voice and other artificial voices. This study implements the audio forensic analysis, which involves pitch, formant, and spectrogram as the parameters. Besides, it also analyses the data by using feature extraction using the Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) method, the Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) method, and applying the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm. The previously made live voice recording and artificial voice are then cut into words. Then, it tests the chunk from the voice recording. The testing of audio forensic techniques with the Praat application obtained similar words between live and artificial voices and provided 40,74% accuracy of information. While the testing by using the MFCC, DTW, KNN methods with the built systems by using Matlab, obtained similar word information between live voice and artificial voice with an accuracy of 33.33%.
Co-Authors Helmy Dzulfikar Sisdarmanto Adinandra, Sisdarmanto