Minsu Ha
Seoul National University, South Korea

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTATIONAL THINKING: SEBUAH KAJIAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS Fanny Rahmatina Rahim; Ari Widodo; Yusi Riksa Yustiana; Minsu Ha
JURNAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN Vol 8, No 2 (2023): JURNAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/jmp.v8i2.1221

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review of the evaluation of computational thinking skills. The research method utilized was a comprehensive search of various databases through Google Scholar using the keyword "computational thinking" to retrieve relevant articles. A total of 96 articles were selected as research samples and analyzed using content analysis technique to examine the variables of education level and evaluation tools. The study found that the education level variable was categorized into four levels: elementary school (26.17%), junior high school (29.91%), senior high school (19.63%), and college (24.30%). Meanwhile, the evaluation tool variable was divided into four categories, which include traditional (22.73%), portfolio (33.33%), interview (15.91%), and survey (28.03%).
ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTATIONAL THINKING: SEBUAH KAJIAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS Fanny Rahmatina Rahim; Ari Widodo; Yusi Riksa Yustiana; Minsu Ha
Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Agustus
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/jmp.v8i2.18

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review of the evaluation of computational thinking skills. The research method utilized was a comprehensive search of various databases through Google Scholar using the keyword "computational thinking" to retrieve relevant articles. A total of 96 articles were selected as research samples and analyzed using content analysis technique to examine the variables of education level and evaluation tools. The study found that the education level variable was categorized into four levels: elementary school (26.17%), junior high school (29.91%), senior high school (19.63%), and college (24.30%). Meanwhile, the evaluation tool variable was divided into four categories, which include traditional (22.73%), portfolio (33.33%), interview (15.91%), and survey (28.03%).