Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Manajemen Mutu Dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru Di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Ikhlas Setungkep Syahdan; Ittihad; Apriawan
Al-Faiza : Journal of Islamic Education Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): OKTOBER
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Al-Gafari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Management quality is often called TQM (Total Quality Management), namely something tool For increasing something product. Teacher professionalism is performance quality, the teacher is a worker profession, Therefore They must uphold high professionalism. In case this TQM is used To increase quality or teacher's abilities to operate his task in other words, become a professional teacher. Study This aim is to know if variable X (Quality Management) has a significant influence on variable Y (Teacher Professionalism). Type of research This is a quantitative study, namely the data used in the study This form numbers. Deep sample study These are teachers at MTs Al-Ikhlas Setungkep, totaling 20 respondents, using cluster sampling technique (area sampling). Data retrieved use a questionnaire and supported with observation data and documentation. Data is processed with SPSS version 20 for Windows with method instrument test analysis, analysis regression simple, and hypothesis testing. The partial test results (t-test) show mark significance 0.268>0.05 meaning variable influence management quality No influential significance to teacher professionalism. Whereas the R square value of 0.068 or 6.8% means variable influence management quality influence teacher professionalism was 6.8%.
Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Dengan Model Pembelajaran Jigsaw dalam Mempengaruhi Efektifitas Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII di SMPN 2 Keruak Ittihad
Aslamiah : Jurnal Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Al-Gafari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Education is provisions man in wade life in this world. Since the beginning man was born in the world has felt enjoyment of education, because, with provisions of education, man can build knowledge, expand insight, and shape his personality. Research purposes This is for a better comparison between Model Learning Problem Solving with Model Learning Jigsaw in increased results Study to students class VIII. Study this is a study experiment. The research design used is a Quasi-Experimental design (experiment pseudo) using the Pretest-posttest control group design model. Collection technique data with the use of documentation and tests. Population in study This is class VIII, and samples study This is class VIII C a class experiment for Learning Models Problem Solving, and class VIII B a class experiment for model learning Jigsaw, each class totaling 30 people. The analysis technique used for hypothesis testing is the t-test. The study results show that: (1) Model Learning Problem Solving effective in increasing results Study Social Sciences Integrated on student class VIII. With ????ℎ???????????????????? = 3.73, and ???????????????????????? = 2.04 with dk (30-1 = 29) at level significance 5%, So ????ℎ???????????????????? > ???????????????????????? namely 7.98 > 2.00, then ????o rejected or Ha accepted. (2) Model Learning Jigsaw No effective in increasing results Study Social Sciences Integrated on student class VIII. With mark ????ℎ???????????????????? =1.02 with level significance 5% (0.05) And et al = 29 so meet ???????????????????????? = 2.04, So ????ℎ???????????????????? < ???????????????????????? namely 1.02 < 2.04, then ????o accepted or Ha rejected. (3) Comparison Learning model Problem Solving with Models Learning Deep jigsaw increases results learning Integrated Social Sciences for students in class VIII. With ????ℎ???????????????????? = 7.98 and ???????????????????????? = 2.00 with level significance 5% (0.05) and dk (???? 1 + ???? 2 − 2 = 30 + 30 - 2) =58. So ????ℎ???????????????????? > ???????????????????????? namely 7.98 > 2.00, so Ho rejected or Ha accepted.