Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Strengthening Global Security: Evaluating the Feasibility of a Nuclear-Armed UN Peacekeeping Force Muhammad Younus; Achmad Nurmandi; Suswanta Suswanta; Abdul Rehman; Imelda Zamjanah Rahmawati; Ibrahim Shah
Journal of World Science Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): Journal of World Science
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jws.v2i9.405

Abstract

This research paper examines the possibility of enhancing global security by establishing a United Nations (UN) peacekeeping force armed with nuclear weapons. Innovative approaches to conflict resolution and deterrence mechanisms are of the utmost importance in an era marked by geopolitical tensions and regional conflicts. This study's primary objective is to evaluate the viability and ramifications of providing UN peacekeepers with nuclear capabilities. To accomplish this objective, a multifaceted research strategy was employed. First, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to comprehend the historical context, current challenges, and potential benefits of a UN peacekeeping force armed with nuclear weapons. To assess the legal and ethical implications of such an initiative, an exhaustive analysis of international legal frameworks, disarmament agreements, and pertinent UN resolutions was conducted. The implications of this research are intricate and nuanced. A UN peacekeeping force armed with nuclear weapons could enhance deterrence and facilitate conflict resolution, but it raises significant concerns regarding proliferation risks, sovereignty, and global power dynamics. The discussion section delves into these findings, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that carefully weighs the pros and cons and the importance of global cooperation in ensuring a secure and peaceful global order. This paper provides policymakers and academics contending with the evolving international security landscape with valuable insights.
Comparative Analysis of Us Policy to Manage Countries Either Through Direct Regime Change or International Sanctions Muhammad Younus; Achmad Nurmandi; Rashid Minhas; Abdul Rehman; Imelda Zamjanah Rahmawati; Ibrahim Shah
Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): September 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjmr.v2i9.6139

Abstract

The present research paper aims to provide a thorough comparative analysis of the United States strategies to exert control over other nations. Specifically, this study evaluates the effectiveness of the United States' two primary approaches: direct regime changes and the imposition of international sanctions. Through a rigorous analysis of historical case studies and policy outcomes, the primary objective of this study is to ascertain the approach that produces more favorable and enduring results. The present analysis explores the multifaceted dimensions of the economic, political, and humanitarian implications of both methods under investigation. By thoroughly examining these aspects, this study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses inherent in each approach.