Suci Lestari
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

TANGGUNG JAWAB BRI ATAS HILANGNYA DANA SIMPANAN NASABAH BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PERBANKAN Jami Allaidin; Suci Lestari
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (345.612 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i1.10181

Abstract

According to Decision Number 211/Pid.sus/2020/PN.Jmb, BRI employee Tumbi Partimbo Pati, who worked as a representative in Abunjani Sipin, Jambi City, defrauded BRI consumers. The phrasing of the issue is whether the decision has applied BRI's responsibility towards consumers based on banking regulations and if BRI's notion of liability for fraud is based on bank secrecy requirements and the Financial Services Authority. The research approach is normative, descriptive in character, uses secondary data, analyzes qualitative data, and relies on deductive reasoning to reach findings. According to the study's findings, analysis, and conclusion, BRI's notion of responsibility for fraud is based on rules governing bank secrecy and the Financial Services Authority, and the bank is not liable for client losses brought on by negligence by the customer himself not maintaining the secrecy of his ATM PIN but customers can request compensation from perpetrators who commit fraud. the fraud and implementation of BRI's responsibility verdict towards customers based on banking regulations, the bank is not criminally responsible but the person who committed the act is convicted, the bank bears the actions of its employees who commit fraud by giving administrative sanctions from the Financial Services Authority based article 52 the Banking Law.
ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN AHLI WARIS MEREK SETIA HATI TERATE BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK Suci Lestari; Simona Bustani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (243.231 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i2.13441

Abstract

The Legal protection for the heirs of the Setia Hati Terate brands is registered under Law no. 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications, provides an overview of the suitability of the Supreme Court Judge's decision Number 40K/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2021 with Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications. The case is about trademark cancellation requests against brands held by the heirs of the brands. So, the problem in this research explains that basically legal protection for the heirs of trademark rights holders is part of the purpose of the law itself. The research discussion shows that legal protection for trademark rights holders is part of the purpose of the law itself. This type of research is normative and analyzed qualitatively. The opinion of several experts argue that the purpose of law is to protect the interests of the community, and also interprets that the purpose of law is to regulate order in society, and others. The conclusion of this research is in the form of how the legal protection for the heirs of trademark rights holders based on Law no. 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI KLAIM ASURANSI JIWA YANG TIDAK DIBAYARKAN OLEH ASURANSI JIWA BERSAMA BUMIPUTERA 1912: Juridical Review of Life Insurance Claims That Are Not Paid By Asuransi Jiwa Bersama Bumiputera 1912 Khalisha Erfira Septianita; Suci Lestari
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19753

Abstract

AJB Bumiputera 1912 does not pay the insurance claims of its policyholders, especially the policies belonging to Mrs. Marlindawati and Mr. Rudhi Mukhtar. The problem is how is the form of AJB Bumiputera 1912's responsibility for non-payment of insurance claims to its policyholders based on insurance law. The research method used is normative, descriptive-analytic in nature, the main data is secondary data supported by interviews, the method of collecting data is by means of literature studies and interviews, qualitative analysis and the method of drawing conclusions is by means of a deductive method. The conclusion of the research is that according to insurance law AJBB must be responsible based on Article 40 paragraph (1) POJK 69/2016, but because AJBB is in the form of a joint venture, Article 33 paragraph (5) AD AJBB regulates losses to be borne by the policyholder as well. Suggestion: AJBB to immediately resolve its liquidity problems and fulfill its obligations and its policyholders can use deliberations to reach a consensus, mediation and arbitration, and file for PKPU or bankruptcy.
TANGGUNG JAWAB BRI ATAS HILANGNYA DANA SIMPANAN NASABAH BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PERBANKAN Jami Allaidin; Suci Lestari
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i1.10181

Abstract

According to Decision Number 211/Pid.sus/2020/PN.Jmb, BRI employee Tumbi Partimbo Pati, who worked as a representative in Abunjani Sipin, Jambi City, defrauded BRI consumers. The phrasing of the issue is whether the decision has applied BRI's responsibility towards consumers based on banking regulations and if BRI's notion of liability for fraud is based on bank secrecy requirements and the Financial Services Authority. The research approach is normative, descriptive in character, uses secondary data, analyzes qualitative data, and relies on deductive reasoning to reach findings. According to the study's findings, analysis, and conclusion, BRI's notion of responsibility for fraud is based on rules governing bank secrecy and the Financial Services Authority, and the bank is not liable for client losses brought on by negligence by the customer himself not maintaining the secrecy of his ATM PIN but customers can request compensation from perpetrators who commit fraud. the fraud and implementation of BRI's responsibility verdict towards customers based on banking regulations, the bank is not criminally responsible but the person who committed the act is convicted, the bank bears the actions of its employees who commit fraud by giving administrative sanctions from the Financial Services Authority based article 52 the Banking Law.
ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN AHLI WARIS MEREK SETIA HATI TERATE BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK Suci Lestari; Simona Bustani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i2.13441

Abstract

The Legal protection for the heirs of the Setia Hati Terate brands is registered under Law no. 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications, provides an overview of the suitability of the Supreme Court Judge's decision Number 40K/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2021 with Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications. The case is about trademark cancellation requests against brands held by the heirs of the brands. So, the problem in this research explains that basically legal protection for the heirs of trademark rights holders is part of the purpose of the law itself. The research discussion shows that legal protection for trademark rights holders is part of the purpose of the law itself. This type of research is normative and analyzed qualitatively. The opinion of several experts argue that the purpose of law is to protect the interests of the community, and also interprets that the purpose of law is to regulate order in society, and others. The conclusion of this research is in the form of how the legal protection for the heirs of trademark rights holders based on Law no. 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS CIPTAAN LOGO PROVINSI PAPUA BARAT MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG HAK CIPTA : Legal Protection Of The Creation Of The West Papua Province Logo According To Copyright Law Izzah Balqies; Suci Lestari
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19298

Abstract

The West Papua Province logo drawn by Pieter Mambor as an order from the Government of West Papua Provincial, Abraham Octavianus Atururi. However, the West Papua Provincial Government does not provide compensation to Pieter Mambor as the creator of the logo image. The main problem in this articles is how is the legal protection of the creation of the West Papua Province logo based on Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright? and whether the decision of the Makassar Commercial Court Number: 3/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Cipta/2022/PN Niaga Mks is accordance Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright? This research is normative type, descriptive nature, the main data is secondary data supported by interviews, data collection methods with literature studies, analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The result of the research is the legal protection of the creation of the West Papua Province logo which is included in the category of fine art images regulated in Article 40 paragraph (1) of the UUHC and Decision 3/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Cipta/2022/PN Niaga Mks is not accordance with Article 9 paragraph (2) of Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The conclusion is that the logo of Papua province is included in the creation protected by copyright.