Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Intan Justiasari
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS ANAK BELUM DEWASA SEBAGAI TURUT TERGUGAT DALAM SENGKETA WARIS (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SUKABUMI NOMOR 0371/PDT.G/2017/PA.SMI) Intan Justiasari; Muriani Muriani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.429 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i1.13257

Abstract

The Sukabumi Religious Court Decision Number 0371/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Smi concerns. It has to do with the legal subject being a minor and the exception being slander. The question put forth is: Can a immature child be dropped as a co-defendant in a case brought before the court? And what justifies the Sukabumi Religious Court's panel of judges rejecting the defendant's exception to the inheritance claim for obscenity libel? The research is descriptive in nature, uses secondary data, is processed in a qualitative manner, and draws findings based on deductive reasoning. The research approach is juridical-normative. Decision Number 0371/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Smi, which was based on the findings of the investigation, discussion, and conclusions, found that the because there were parties who were immature and who were not being represented by their legal adult, the lawsuit had formal flaws and was not legally valid. This was determined by a judge. The claim is therefore unacceptably false as a result. The reason for the judge's consideration breaches the process for modifying a case, thus it is not in compliance with the applicable law.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS ANAK BELUM DEWASA SEBAGAI TURUT TERGUGAT DALAM SENGKETA WARIS (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SUKABUMI NOMOR 0371/PDT.G/2017/PA.SMI) Intan Justiasari; Muriani Muriani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i1.13257

Abstract

The Sukabumi Religious Court Decision Number 0371/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Smi concerns. It has to do with the legal subject being a minor and the exception being slander. The question put forth is: Can a immature child be dropped as a co-defendant in a case brought before the court? And what justifies the Sukabumi Religious Court's panel of judges rejecting the defendant's exception to the inheritance claim for obscenity libel? The research is descriptive in nature, uses secondary data, is processed in a qualitative manner, and draws findings based on deductive reasoning. The research approach is juridical-normative. Decision Number 0371/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Smi, which was based on the findings of the investigation, discussion, and conclusions, found that the because there were parties who were immature and who were not being represented by their legal adult, the lawsuit had formal flaws and was not legally valid. This was determined by a judge. The claim is therefore unacceptably false as a result. The reason for the judge's consideration breaches the process for modifying a case, thus it is not in compliance with the applicable law.
Co-Authors Muriani Muriani